Tuesday, 30 January 2018

निवडणूक अधिकाऱ्यावर दबाव प्रकरण : महादेव जानकर दोषमुक्त

निवडणूक अधिकाऱ्यावर दबाव प्रकरण : महादेव जानकर दोषमुक्त

दबाव टाकल्याच्या प्रकरणाची चित्रफीतही व्हायरल; आरोप सिद्ध करण्यात अपयश

राज्यात गाजलेल्या देसाईगंज नगर परिषद निवडणुकीत निवडणूक निर्णय अधिकाऱ्यावर दबाव टाकल्याच्या प्रकरणात पशुसंवर्धन, दुग्धविकास व मत्स्यविकास मंत्री आणि राष्ट्रीय समाज पक्षाचे नेते महादेव जानकर यांना मंगळवारी देसाईगंज न्यायालयाने दिलासा दिला. न्यायालयाने सबळपुराव्या अभावी जानकर यांना दोषमुक्त केले आहे. डिसेंबर २०१६ रोजी देसाईगंज नगर परिषदेची सार्वत्रिक निवडणूक होती. तत्पूर्वी ५ डिसेंबर २०१६ रोजी मंत्री महादेव जानकर देसाईगंज येथे आले होते. त्यांनी प्रभाग क्रमांक ९ ब मधील काँग्रेसचे उमेदवार जेसा मोटवानी यांच्या पक्षातर्फे सादर केलेले नामनिर्देशनपत्र मागे घेऊ द्यावे व त्यांना कपबशी हे निवडणूक चिन्ह द्यावे, यासाठी निवडणूक निर्णय अधिकाऱ्यांवर दबाव आणला. याबाबतची चित्रफीतही व्हायरल झाली होती. या प्रकरणी काँग्रेसने निवडणूक आयोगाकडे तक्रार दाखल केली होती. निवडणूक आयोगाच्या आदेशानुसार मंत्री महादेव जानकर व उमेदवार जेसा मोटवानी यांच्या विरुध्द लोकसेवकाला कायदेशीर कृत्य करताना दबाव आणल्याप्रकरणी देसाईगंज पोलिस ठाण्यात गुन्हा दाखल करण्यात आला होता. १९ जानेवारीला झालेल्या सुनावणीत न्यायालयात चार जणांची साक्ष तपासण्यात आली होती. मंगळवारी न्यायालयाने दिलेल्या निकालात जानकर यांना दोषमुक्त केले. सबळ पुराव्या अभावी त्यांची सुटका करण्यात आली.



प्रकरणाचा तपशील

: फौजदारी किरकोळ अर्ज
: 553/2016;: 13-12-2016

: MHGA05-000609-2016

प्रकरणाची सद्यःस्थिती





याचिकाकर्ता आणि वकील /विधीज्ञ

1) महाराष्र्ट सरकार द्वारा पो.स्टे. देसाईगंज
    वकील /विधीज्ञ- सरकारी वकील

प्रत्युत्तरार्थी आणि वकील /विधीज्ञ

1) महादेव जगन्नाथ जानकर

2) जेसामल अर्जुनदास मोटवाणी
        

अधिनियम

या अधिनियमां (मे) अंतर्गतकलम (मे) अंतर्गत
भारतीय दंड संहिता166,186
महाराष्ट्र नगर परिषद्, नगर पंचायत व औद्योगिक वसाहत अधिनियम १९६५22(6)

प्रथम माहिती अहवाल तपशील

पोलीस ठाणे
प्रथम माहिती अहवाल क्रमांक
वर्ष


 प्रकरणातील सुनावणीचा इतिवृत्तांत

नोंदणी क्रमांकन्यायाधीशतारखेवरील कामकाजसुनावणीची तारीखसुनावणीचा उद्देश
75/2016दिवाणी न्यायाधिश क.स्तर, तथा न्यायदंडाधिकारी13-12-2016विल्हेवाट







POLITICAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS BUREAU (PRAB) PUNE

पॉलिटिकल रिसर्च अॅण्ड अॅनालिसेस ब्युरो (प्राब)

Monday, 29 January 2018

शेतकरी धर्मा पाटील यांच्यावर खरा अन्याय कोणी केला? लाज कोणाला वाटावी!

शेतकऱ्यांच्या आत्महत्या आणि राजकारण



धुळे जिल्ह्यातील शिंदखेडा तालुक्यातील विखरण येथील 84 वर्षीय शेतकरी धर्मा पाटील यांनी शेतजमिनीला योग्य मोबदला मिळावा यासाठी २२ जानेवारीस मंत्रालयात विष पिऊन आत्महत्येचा प्रयत्न केला होता. त्यांच्यावर मुंबईत सेंट जॉर्ज हॉस्पिटलमध्ये अतिदक्षता विभागात उपचार सुरू होते. धर्मा पाटील यांचे प्राण वाचवण्यासाठी अतोनात प्रयत्न केले होते, मात्र ते अपयशी ठरले. धर्मा पाटलांच्या मुलाने अवयवदानाचा अर्ज भरला होता. त्यांचे डोळे दान केले आहेत. धर्मा पाटलांच्या विषप्राशनानंतर सरकारने पाटील यांच्या कुटुंबियांना 15 लाखाचं सामुग्रह अनुदान देऊ केलं. मात्र अनुदान नको, आम्हाला मोबदला द्या, अशी मागणी लावून पाटील कुटुंबाने धरली आहे. दरम्यान, आपल्याला न्याय मिळेपर्यंत आपण वडिलांचा मृतदेह हलवणार नाही असे धर्मा पाटील यांच्या मुलांने अशी भूमिका घेतली होती.  दरम्यान धर्मा पाटील यांच्या कुटुंबीयांना प्रति हेक्टरी १० लाख रुपये सानुग्रह अनुदान देता येईल का याबाबत सरकारचा विचार सुरु आहे, अशी सरकारची भूमिका  ऊर्जामंत्री चंद्रशेखर बावनकुळे यांनी स्पष्ट केली. १९९ हेक्टर जागेचे फेरमूल्यांकन करण्याचे आदेश जिल्हाधिकाऱ्यांनी दिले असून धर्मा पाटील यांच्या कुटुंबीयांवर अन्याय होणार नाही, अशी ग्वाही देखील त्यांनी दिली आहे. जुलै २००९ मध्ये प्रकल्पासाठी भूसंपादनाची प्रक्रिया सुरु झाली आणि मार्च २०१५ मध्ये ही प्रक्रिया पूर्ण झाली. या निवाड्याविरोधात धर्मा पाटील यांनी कलम १८ अंतर्गत कोर्टात जाणे अपेक्षित असते. भूसंपादनात कमी भाव मिळाला असेल, झाडांचे मूल्यांकन कमी झाले असेल कोर्टात दाद मागावी लागते. मात्र, धर्मा पाटील यांनी सुरुवातीला मोबदला स्वीकारला. मात्र, त्यानंतर त्यांनी जागेला कमी भाव मिळाला अशी तक्रार केली. अशी माहिती सरकारने स्पष्ट केली आहे.

सहा दिवस मृत्यूशी झुंज देणारे 84 वर्षीय शेतकरी धर्मा पाटील यांच्या निधनांनतर विरोधकांनी सरकारवर हल्लाबोल केला आहे. शेतजमिनीला योग्य मोबदला मिळावा यासाठी मंत्रालयात विषप्राशन केलेले शेतकरी धर्मा पाटील यांच्या निधनानंतर विरोधकांनी सरकारवर जोरदार टीकास्त्र सोडले आहे. सरकारने धर्मा पाटील यांची ही एक प्रकारे हत्या केली असून, मुख्यमंत्री देवेंद्र फडणवीस यांना लाज वाटली पाहिजे, अशा शब्दात राष्ट्रवादी कॉंग्रेसच्या खासदार सुप्रिया सुळे यांनी ट्विटरवरुन टीका केली आहे. तर जमिनीचा योग्य मोबदला मिळावा म्हणून मंत्रालयात विष प्राशन करून आत्महत्येचा प्रयत्न करणारे शेतकरी पाटील यांचे निधन झाले. धर्मा पाटील यांचा मृत्यू ही सरकारी हत्या आहे. सरकारविरोधात 302 चा गुन्हा दाखल केला पाहिजे, अशी मागणी करणारे ट्वीट्ट काँग्रेसचे प्रदेशाध्यक्ष खासदार अशोक चव्हाण यांनी केली आहे. विधान परिषदेचे विरोधी पक्षनेते धनंजय मुंडे यांनी सरकारवर टीका करताना ‘सरकारचे सर्वोच्च स्थान असलेल्या मंत्रालयात येऊन तुम्ही जीव दिला तरी हे गेंड्याच्या कातडीचे सरकार तुम्हाला न्याय देऊ शकत नाही, हे धर्मा पाटील यांच्या निधनाने स्पष्ट झाले. या सरकारचा धिक्कार असून धर्मा पाटील यांच्या निधनासाठी राज्य सरकारच जबाबदार आहे, असे ट्विट्ट केले आहे. संबंधितांविरोधात हत्येचा गुन्हा दाखल करावा, अशी मागणी मुंडे यांनी केली आहे. शेतकऱ्यांच्या आत्महत्या आणि त्याचे राजकारण झाले नाही असे होणार नाहीच, मात्र खरी वस्तुस्थिती काय आहे हे जाणून घेणे देखील महत्त्वाचे आहे.

प्रसारमाध्यमांतून मिळालेली माहिती- 

या प्रकरणी प्रसारमाध्यमांतून माहिती मिळाली ती, धुळे जिल्ह्यात होणाऱ्या औष्णिक वीज प्रकल्पात त्यांची पाच एकर जमीन संपादित करण्यात आली होती. मात्र पाच एकराच्या बदल्यात त्यांना केवळ चार लाख रुपये भरपाई देण्यात आले होते, धर्मा पाटील यांच्या चार एकर जमिनीत आंब्याची 600 झाडं होती. विहीर, ठिबक सिंचन आणि वीज अशी बागायती शेती असलेल्या धर्मा पाटील यांना केवळ 4 लाखांचा मोबदला देण्यात आला. इतर शेतकऱ्यांच्या तुलनेत भरपाई कमी मिळाल्याबाबत धर्मा पाटील यांनी गेल्या तीन महिन्यांपासून पाठपुरावा सुरू केला. मात्र त्यांना अधिकारी आणि संबंधित मंत्रालयाकडून योग्य उत्तरं मिळत नसल्याने त्यांनी विषप्राशन केलं होते. अशाप्रकारचे वृत्त बहूतेक प्रसारमाध्यमांनी दिले आहेत.

अन्याय खरा कोणी केला? - 

शेतकरी धर्मा पाटील यांच्यावर अन्याय खरा कोणी केला याची चौकशी तर होईलच परंतू महाराष्ट्रात असे फसवणूक झालेले व जमिनीचे आर्थिक मोबदल्याबाबत फसवणूक झालेले अनेक शेतकरी आहेत. प्रस्तावित प्रकल्प होणार याची माहिती केवळ लोकप्रतिनिधी आणि संबंधित अधिकारी यांनाच असते. अशा प्रस्तावित प्रकल्प बाधित शेतकऱ्यांच्या जमिनी संपादन शासकीय दराने म्हणजे बाजारभावापेक्षा कमी दराने घेतल्या जातील अशी भीती दाखवून लोकप्रतिनिधी आणि संबंधित अधिकारी यांचे साटेलोटे असलेले व्यवसायिक स्वतः गुंतवणूक करतात. कमी दराने खरेदी करून शासनाकडून जास्त मोबदला घेतात. अर्थातच सर्व मिळालेला नफा / फायदा हा  व्यवसायिक, सहभागी लोकप्रतिनिधी आणि संबंधित अधिकारी घेत असतात हि राज्यातील वस्तुस्थिती कोणीही नाकारू शकत नाही. व्यवसायिक आणि सहभागी लोकप्रतिनिधी आणि संबंधित अधिकारी यांच्या साटेलोटे असलेल्या जाळ्यातून शेतकरी धर्मा पाटील कसे सुटतील! आणि या अभद्र युतीनेच खरा अन्याय धर्मा पाटील यांच्या सारख्या हजारो शेतकऱ्यावर केला जात आहे.

या प्रकरणातील महत्वपूर्ण माहिती -- 

धर्मा पाटील यांचा संघर्ष (2003 ते २०१८)

कसा होता संपादन घटनाक्रम? - (2009 ते 2014)

*  प्रस्ताव दाखल -  8 मे 2009
* संयुक्त मोजणी - 13 सप्टेंबर 2011
* एल.ए. अॅक्ट कलम 4 अन्वये प्रारंभिक अधिसूचना 13 जून 2012
* कलम 5(अ) अन्वये चौकशी, संपादित जमिनीचं स्थळ निरीक्षण 1 ऑक्टोबर 2012
* कलम 6 अन्वये अंतिम अधिसूचना 26 फेब्रुवारी, 2014
* कलम 9(1)(2) अन्वये हरकती आणि सुनावणी 7 एप्रिल 2014
धर्मा पाटील यांच्या ५ एकर जमिनीला ४ लाख ३ हजार रुपये आणि बाजूच्याच शेतकऱ्याला २ एकरासाठी १ कोटी ८९ लाख ४३ हजार रुपये मोबदला दिला गेला. हे सर्व प्रकरण होत असताना यामध्ये मोठा भ्रष्टाचार झालेला असून, अधिकाऱ्यांनी दलालाच्या माध्यमातून हा भ्रष्टाचार केलेला आहे.


* २२ जानेवारीस मंत्रालयात विष पिऊन आत्महत्येचा प्रयत्न केला त्यांचे नाव-  कै. धर्मा मंगा पाटील (उपचारादरम्यान निधन)
* पत्नीचे नाव - श्रीमती सखुबाई धर्मा पाटील 
* मुलाचे नाव - नरेंद्र धर्मा पाटील
* राहणार व शेतजमीन- गाव- विखरण, तालुका-  शिंदखेडा, जि. धुळे
* शेतजमीन - खाते क्र. २७७० आणि १२१९
* शेतजमीन गट- गट क्र. २९१ ( २९१ या गटात एकूण तीन हिस्से आहेत.)
1. २९१/१ - 
2. २९१/२/अ - 
3. २९१/२/ब - 
असे तीन हिस्से आहेत.

1. २९१/१ - 

भुधारणा पद्धती- भोगवटादार वर्ग -1
भोगवटदाराचे नांव- गुरुचरण आणि महाराष्ट्र विजनिर्मिती कंपनी मर्या.------सामाईक क्षेत्र------
क्षेत्र- जिरायत - 0.95.00 हे.आर. तर पोटखराब (लागवडीस अयोग्य)- एकुण पो ख 1.08.00 असे एकूण क्षेत्र- २.०३.०० हे.आर. (म्हणजेच ५ एकर ३ गुंठे)
सातबारा वरील सर्व नोंद असलेले फेरफार क्र. (1),(273),(1427),(1532),(1833),(2260),(2772),(3225)
धर्मा मंगा पाटील व रंजना विजय सोनवणे यांच्याकडून खरेदी घेतलेले कैलास कांतीलाल जैन यांना महाराष्ट्र विजनिर्मिती कंपनी मर्या. यांना मोबदला देऊन खरेदी संपादन झाल्याने (कैलास कांतीलाल जैन) यांचे नाव कमी केले. अशी महसुली नोंद आहे.

या जागेचे खरेदीखत दस्त नोंद- 
दुय्यम निबंधक : सिंदखेड यांच्या कार्यालयात दस्त क्रमांक : 2803/2003 नोदंणी केली आहे. दस्त नोंदणी केल्याचा दिनांक 05/12/2003 असून मोबदला रु. 55000 (पंचावन्न हजार) दिला आहे. शासकीय बाजारभावाप्रमाणे किमत- रु. 1,14,000/- (एक लाख तर चौदा हजार) नमूद केले आहे. मिळकत वर्णन- इतर वर्णन :जिल्ह्याचे नाव : धुळे, तालुक्याचे नाव : शिंदखेडा, विभाग ग्रा.पं.हद्यीतील जिरायत शेत जमीन एकुण क्षेत्र.हे 2.03 असे नमूद आहे. दस्तऐवज करुन घेणा-या पक्षकाराचे नाव व पत्ता - कैलास कांतीलाल जैन असे आहे. तर दस्तऐवज करुन देणा-या पक्षकाराचे नाव - सौ.सखुबाई धर्मा पाटील असे आहे.

या जागेचे खरेदीखत दस्त नोंद- 
या जागेचे खरेदीखत दुय्यम निबंधक : सिंदखेड यांच्या कार्यालयात दस्त क्रमांक : 2148/2012 नोदंणी केली आहे. दस्त नोंदणी केल्याचा दिनांक 25/04/2012 असून मोबदला रु. 20,30,000 (वीस लाख तीस हजार) दिला आहे. शासकीय बाजारभावाप्रमाणे किमत- रु. 29,0290/- (एकूणतीस लाख ) नमूद केले आहे. मिळकत वर्णन- वर्णन :मौजे विखरण येथील जिरायत शेतजमीन मिळकत. गट नं 291/1 चे क्षेत्र हे 0.95 आर पो.ख.हे 1.08 आर एकूण क्षेत्र हे 2.03 आर असे आहे. दस्तऐवज करुन घेणा-या पक्षकाराचे नाव व पत्ता - महाराष्ट्र राज्य वीज निर्मिती कंपनी मर्या.V27730339386 तर्फे श्री.शशिकांत बाबुराव गिरी,कार्यकारी अभियंता (स्था.)स्थापत्य बांधकाम विभाग,म.रा.वि.नि.क.मर्या,धुळे पॅन नं AAECM2935R असे आहे. तर दस्तऐवज करुन देणा-या पक्षकाराचे नाव - रंजना विजय सोनवणे असे आहे.

या जागेचे खरेदीखत दस्त नोंद- 
दुय्यम निबंधक : सिंदखेड यांच्या कार्यालयात दस्त क्रमांक : 1723/2009 नोदंणी केली आहे. दस्त नोंदणी केल्याचा दिनांक 05/06/2009 असून मोबदला रु. 70,000 (सत्तर हजार) दिला आहे. शासकीय बाजारभावाप्रमाणे किमत- रु. 2,21,270/- (दोन लाख तर एकवीस हजार) नमूद केले आहे. मिळकत वर्णन- धुळे, तालुक्याचे नाव : शिंदखेडा, विभागाचा नंबर : 4, विभागाचे नाव : विखरण, मिळकतीचा प्रकार : शेती. मौजे विखरण येथील गट नं. 291/1 चे क्षेत्र.हे. 0.95 आर पो.ख.क्षेत्र.हे. 1.08 आर एकुण क्षेत्र.हे. 2.03 आर आकार रु. 1.05 पै. या क्षेत्राची जिरायत शेतजमीन मी तुम्हांस पक्के खरेदी दिली आहे  असे नमूद आहे. दस्तऐवज करुन घेणा-या पक्षकाराचे नाव व पत्ता - रंजना विजय सोनवणे असे आहे. तर दस्तऐवज करुन देणा-या पक्षकाराचे नाव - कैलास कांतीलाल जैन असे आहे. (291/1 चे क्षेत्र यापैकी जिरायत शेतजमीन मी तुम्हांस पक्के खरेदी दिली हा दस्ताचा विषय आहे.)

2. २९१/२/अ -

भुधारणा पद्धती- भोगवटादार वर्ग -1
भोगवटदाराचे नांव- धर्मा मगा पाटील
क्षेत्र- जिरायत - 0.50.00 हे.आर. तर पोटखराब (लागवडीस अयोग्य)- एकुण पो ख 0.54.00  असे एकूण क्षेत्र- १.०४.०० हे.आर. (म्हणजेच २ एकर ४४ गुंठे)
सातबारा वरील सर्व नोंद असलेले फेरफार क्र. ( 2260 ),(1832),(1865),(1866),(3226) इतर अधिकार- इतर- 4(1)अन्नये सपादनासाठी औष्णिक विधूत प्रकल्प ( 1855 ) बोजा - सहकारी सोसायटी इकरार, विखराण वि का से सो यांचा र रु 25000- बोजा ( 1865 )

या जागेचे खरेदीखत दस्त नोंद- 
दुय्यम निबंधक : सिंदखेड यांच्या कार्यालयात दस्त क्रमांक : 1724/2009 नोदंणी केली आहे. दस्त नोंदणी केल्याचा दिनांक 05/06/2009 असून मोबदला रु. 35,000 (पसतीस हजार) दिला आहे. शासकीय बाजारभावाप्रमाणे किमत- रु. 1,13,360/- (एक लाख तर हजार) नमूद केले आहे. मिळकत वर्णन- वर्णन :धुळे, तालुक्याचे नाव : शिंदखेडा, विभागाचा नंबर : 4, विभागाचे नाव : विखरण, मिळकतीचा प्रकार : शेती. मौजे विखरण येथील गट नं. 291/2 चे क्षेत्र.हे. 0.95 आर पो.ख.क्षेत्र.हे. 1.09 आर एकुण क्षेत्र.हे. 2.04 आर आकार रु. 1.15 पै. यापैकी पुर्व पश्चिम बांध टाकुन उत्तरेकडील क्षेत्र.हे. 0.50 आर पो.ख.क्षेत्र.हे. 0.54 आर एकुण क्षेत्र.हे. 1.04 आर आकार रु.0.60 पै. असे आहे. दस्तऐवज करुन घेणा-या पक्षकाराचे नाव व पत्ता- धर्मा मंगा पाटील असे आहे. तर दस्तऐवज करुन देणा-या पक्षकाराचे नाव - कैलास कांतीलाल जैन असे आहे. (291/2 चे क्षेत्र यापैकी पुर्व पश्चिम बांध टाकुन उत्तरेकडील क्षेत्र.हे. 0.50 आर हा दस्ताचा विषय आहे.)

3. २९१/२/ब 

भुधारणा पद्धती- भोगवटादार वर्ग -1
भोगवटदाराचे नांव- नरेंद्र धर्मा पाटील
क्षेत्र- जिरायत - 0.45.00 हे.आर. तर पोटखराब (लागवडीस अयोग्य)- एकुण पो ख 0.55.00 असे एकूण क्षेत्र- 1.00.00 हे.आर. (म्हणजेच अडीच एकर)
सातबारा वरील सर्व नोंद असलेले फेरफार क्र. २२६१ व ३२२६ तसेच इतर अधिकार विहीर( 1855 ) इतर 4(1)अन्नये सपादनासाठी औष्णिक विधूत प्रकल्प ( 1855 )

या जागेचे खरेदीखत दस्त नोंद- 
दुय्यम निबंधक : सिंदखेड यांच्या कार्यालयात दस्त क्रमांक : 2802/2003 नोदंणी केली आहे. दस्त नोंदणी केल्याचा दिनांक 05/12/2003 असून मोबदला रु. 55000 (पंचावन्न हजार) दिला आहे. शासकीय बाजारभावाप्रमाणे किमत- रु. 1,15,000/- (एक लाख तर पंधरा हजार) नमूद केले आहे. मिळकत वर्णन- इतर वर्णन :जिल्ह्याचे नाव : धुळे, तालुक्याचे नाव : शिंदखेडा, विभाग ग्रा.पं.हद्यीतील जिरायत शेत जमीन एकुण क्षेत्र.हे 2.04 असे नमूद आहे. दस्तऐवज करुन घेणा-या पक्षकाराचे नाव व पत्ता - कैलास कांतीलाल जैन असे आहे. तर दस्तऐवज करुन देणा-या पक्षकाराचे नाव - श्री धर्मा मंगा पाटील असे आहे.

या जागेचे खरेदीखत दस्त नोंद- 
दुय्यम निबंधक : सिंदखेड यांच्या कार्यालयात दस्त क्रमांक : 1722/2009 नोदंणी केली आहे. दस्त नोंदणी केल्याचा दिनांक 05/06/2009 असून मोबदला रु. 35000 (पसतीस हजार) दिला आहे. शासकीय बाजारभावाप्रमाणे किमत- रु. 1,09,000/- (एक लाख तर नऊ हजार) नमूद केले आहे. मिळकत वर्णन- इतर वर्णन :जिल्ह्याचे नाव : धुळे, तालुक्याचे नाव : शिंदखेडा, विभागाचा नंबर : 4, विभागाचे नाव : विखरण, मिळकतीचा प्रकार : शेती. मौजे विखरण येथील गट नं. 291/2 चे क्षेत्र.हे. 0.95 आर पो.ख.क्षेत्र.हे. 1.09 आर एकुण क्षेत्र.हे. 2.04 आर आकार रु. 1.15 पै. यापैकी पुर्व पश्चिम बांध टाकुन दक्षिणेकडील क्षेत्र.हे. 0.45 आर पो.ख.क्षेत्र.हे. 0.55 आर एकुण क्षेत्र.हे. 1.00 आर आकार रु.0.55 पै. या क्षेत्राची जिरायत शेतजमीन मी तुम्हांस पक्के खरेदी दिली आहे. असे नमूद आहे. दस्तऐवज करुन घेणा-या पक्षकाराचे नाव व पत्ता - नरेंद्र धर्मा पाटील असे आहे. तर दस्तऐवज करुन देणा-या पक्षकाराचे नाव - कैलास कांतीलाल जैन असे आहे. (291/२ चे क्षेत्र यापैकी पुर्व पश्चिम बांध टाकुन दक्षिणेकडील क्षेत्र.हे. 0.45 आर पो.ख.क्षेत्र.हे. 0.55 आर एकुण क्षेत्र.हे. 1.00 आर आकार रु.0.55 पै. या क्षेत्राची जिरायत शेतजमीन मी तुम्हांस पक्के खरेदी दिली हा दस्ताचा विषय आहे.)

कोण आहेत कैलास कांतीलाल जैन 
कैलास कांतीलाल जैन हे किशोर फुड्स प्रॉडक्टस प्रा.ली. कंपनीचे संचालक आहेत. Kishor Food Products Private Limited या कंपनीत Director पदी दिनांक 22 August 2004 रोजी नियुक्त झाले आहेत. Kishor Food Products Private Limited हि कंपनी 17 March 1988 रोजी स्थापन करण्यात आली आहे. (CIN)U15200MH1988PTC046571 असा असून  registration number is 46571. असा आहे तर  registered address is MATRUCHHAYASTATION AREA DONDAICHA MH 000000 IN असा आहे.

* रंजना विजय सोनवणे यांची माहिती उपलब्ध नाही

जुलै २००९ मध्ये प्रकल्पासाठी भूसंपादनाची प्रक्रिया सुरु झाली आणि मार्च २०१५ मध्ये ही प्रक्रिया पूर्ण झाली अशी  माहिती सरकारने दिली आहे . या जागेचे व्यवहार 2003 पासूनच झाले आहेत. त्यावेळी सदर प्रकल्प प्रस्तावित होता. भूसंपादनाची प्रक्रिया जुलै २००९ सुरु झाली त्यावेळी  पुन्हा व्यवहार झाले आहेत.

वरील सर्व माहिती विषद केल्यानंतर लक्षात येते कि कोणी कोणाची फसवणूक केली आहे. धर्मा पाटील यांच्यावर अन्याय कोणी केला आहे. कदाचित सर्व वस्तुस्थिती मुलाला माहित असल्याने वारंवार भूमिकेत बदल केला जात असावा असे वाटते तर धर्मा पाटील हे व्यवहारात अज्ञातपोटी आपली जमीन कवडीमोल दराने गेली व आपली फसवणूक झाली असा समाज करून सर्व राग अखेर सरकारवर काढण्यात आला आहे यामध्ये त्यांचा दोष नाही हे दिसून येत आहेच. केवळ खरी वस्तुस्थिती सर्वसामान्य जनतेस माहित व्हावी या उद्देशाने माहित देण्यात येत आहे. कोणाचीही बद्नही व अवहेलना करण्याचा कोणताही उद्देश नाही.












POLITICAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS BUREAU (PRAB) PUNE

पॉलिटिकल रिसर्च अॅण्ड अॅनालिसेस ब्युरो (प्राब) पुणे महाराष्ट्र


Thursday, 25 January 2018

राष्ट्रीय मतदार दिन शुभेच्छा

               Your vote is your voice. It is your voice that oils the wheels of this democracy. 




पॉलिटिकल रिसर्च अॅण्ड अॅनालिसेस ब्युरो (प्राब)

POLITICAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS BUREAU (PRAB)





Wednesday, 24 January 2018

६८७१ रिक्तपदांसह राज्यातील ३१७ ग्रामपंचायतीसाठी २५ फेब्रुवारीला मतदान; पुणे जिल्ह्यातील ३७ ग्रामपंचायतीच्या निवडणुका

राज्यातील ३१७ ग्रामपंचायतीसाठी २५ फेब्रुवारी २०१८ ला मतदान
६८७१ रिक्तपदांकरिता देखील निवडणुक कार्यक्रम जाहीर 

माहे मार्च 2018 ते मे 2018 मध्ये मुदत संपणाऱ्या व नव्याने स्थापित ग्रामपंचायतींच्या सार्वत्रिक निवडणूकीत सरपंचपदासह सर्व सदस्य पदांसाठी तसेच रिक्त पदांच्या पोट निवडणूकांसाठी निवडणूक कार्यक्रम जाहीर करण्यात आला आहे. यामध्ये राज्यभरातील ३१७ ग्रामपंचायतीच्या निवडणुका २५ फेब्रुवारी २०१८ रोजी होणार आहेत. ३१७ ग्रामपंचायतीमध्ये कोकण विभागातील ४२, नाशिक विभागातील ७५, पुणे विभागातील १३२, औरंगाबाद विभागातील ३५, अमरावती विभागातील ११, नागपूर विभागातील २२ ग्रामपंचायतीचा समावेश आहे. पुणे जिल्ह्यातील ३७ ग्रामपंचायतीचा समावेश आहे.तसेच राज्यभरातील रिक्त पदे असलेल्या ग्रामपंचायतीची संख्या ४१०१ असून त्यामधील ६८७१ रिक्तपदांकरिता देखील निवडणुक कार्यक्रम जाहीर करण्यात आला आहे. निवडणूक जाहीर झालेल्या गावांमध्ये आचारसंहिता लागू करण्यात आली आहे.



===================

पुणे जिल्ह्यातील ३७ ग्रामपंचायतीच्या निवडणुका

पुणे जिल्ह्यातील ३७ ग्रामपंचायतीच्या निवडणुका होणार आहेत. याव्यतिरिक्त रिक्त पदे असलेल्या २७४ ग्रामपंचायतीमधील ५७६ सदस्यांच्या निवडणुकीसाठी २५ फेब्रुवारीला मतदान होणार आहे. नामनिर्देशन अर्ज दिनांक ५ फेब्रुवारी २०१८ ते १० फेब्रुवारी २०१८ पर्यंत दाखल करता येणार आहेत तर 12 फेब्रुवारी- उमेदवारी अर्जांची छाननी करण्यात येईल. 15 फेब्रुवारी- उमेदवारी अर्ज मागे घेण्याचा शेवटचा दिवस असून २५ फेब्रुवारी २०१८ रोजी मतदान घेण्यात येणार असून २६ फेब्रुवारी २०१८ रोजी मतमोजणी होणार आहे. पुणे जिल्ह्यातील वेल्हे-1, मावळ-६, भोर-९, जुन्नर-1 मुळशी-७ खेड-६ आंबेगाव- ७ या ३७ ग्रामपंचायतीच्या निवडणुका होणार आहेत.


============================

वडगाव मावळ तालुक्‍यातील वडगावसह 6 ग्रामपंचायतींची निवडणूक

मावळ तालुक्‍यातील सर्वांत मोठ्या वडगाव ग्रामपंचायतीसह भाजे, लोहगड, वाकसई, सांगिसे व मुंढावरे या सहा ग्रामपंचायतींची पंचवार्षिक निवडणूक होणार आहे तसेच इतर सोळा ग्रामपंचायतींमधील रिक्त असलेल्या जागांसाठी पोटनिवडणूक होणार आहे. येत्या मार्च ते मे 2018 या कालावधीत मुदत संपणाऱ्या ग्रामपंचायतींच्या सार्वत्रिक निवडणुकीचा कार्यक्रम राज्य निवडणूक आयोगाने जाहीर केला आहे. त्यात मावळ तालुक्‍यातील सर्वांत मोठ्या वडगाव-कातवी ग्रुप ग्रामपंचायतीसह भाजे, लोहगड, वाकसई, सांगिसे व मुंढावरे या ग्रामपंचायतींचा समावेश आहे. पुसाणे, शिलाटणे, ओझर्डे, आपटी, मळवली, आंबी, येलघोळ, टाकवे बुद्रुक, खांड, साते, खडकाळा, थुगाव, परंदवडी, आंबेगाव, माळवाडी व वराळे येथील रिक्त असलेल्या काही जागांची पोटनिवडणूक होणार आहेत.
====================

कोल्हापूर जिल्ह्यातील 77 ग्रामपंचायतींची निवडणूक

कोल्हापूर जिल्ह्यातील 77 ग्रामपंचायतींच्या सार्वत्रिक निवडणुकांचा कार्यक्रम जाहीर झाला आहे. तसेच कोल्हापूर जिल्ह्यातील 427 ग्रामपंचायतींच्या 804 रिक्‍त जागांसाठीही पोट निवडणूक होणार आहे.मार्च ते मे महिन्यादरम्यान मुदत संपणार्‍या तसेच नव्याने स्थापन झालेल्या ग्रामपंचायतींच्या सार्वत्रिक निवडणुकांचा कार्यक्रम राज्य निवडणूक आयोगाने जाहीर केला आहे. ही निवडणुकीत थेट सरपंच, सर्व ग्रामपंचायत सदस्यांसाठी तसेच रिक्‍त पदांच्या पोट निवडणुकांसाठी निवडणूक कार्यक्रम जाहीर झाला आहे. या निवडणुकीची नोटीस संबंधित तहसीलदार दि. 25 रोजी काढणार आहेत. जिल्ह्यात 217 ग्रामपंचायतींची दोन महिन्यांपूर्वीच सार्वत्रिक निवडणूक झाली होती. निवडणुका होत असलेल्या ग्रामपंचायतींमध्ये मोठ्या ग्रामपंचायतींचाही समावेश आहे. सातारा तालुक्यातील वडगाव, धावडशी, कारी, लुमणेखोल; कोरेगाव तालुक्यातील मुगाव, शिरढोण, भाटमवाडी; जावली तालुक्यातील सांगवी तर्फे मेढा, आगलावेवाडी, आसणी, बिभवी, गांजे, गोंदेमाळ, ओखवडी, पानस तळोशी, वाळंजवाडी, ऐकीव, भोगवली तर्फ मेढा, कावडी, कोळघर, तेटली, भाटघर, केळघर तर्फ सोळशी, वाघदरे; कराड तालुक्यातील बानुगडेवाडी, भोसलेवाडी, गोसावेवाडी, हेळगाव, कांबीरवाडी, पिंपरी, रेठरे बु॥, सयापूर, शेळकेवाडी (येवती), टेंभू, येणपे, यशवंतनगर, येवती; पाटण तालुक्यातील कुसरुंड, बेलवडे खुर्द, शितपवडी, चौगुलेवाडी, गावडेवाडी, उधवणे, रुवले, जिंती, गमेवाडी, गुंजाळी, किल्‍लेमोरगिरी; वाई तालुक्यातील कोंढावळे, विठ्ठलवाडी, खडकी, वडोली, चिंधवली, ओहळी; महाबळेश्‍वर तालुक्यातील पर्वत तर्फ वाघावळे, देवळी, मांघर, अवकज्ञाळी, पारुट, गुरेघर, रेणोशी, निवळी, आरव, लामज, मोरणी, सालोशी, वलवण, आचली, उचाट; खटाव तालुक्यातील फडतरवाडी (बुध), पांगारखेळ, उंबरमळे, बुध, काटेवाडी तर माण तालुक्यातील बिंजवडी या गावांचा समावेश आहे.

POLITICAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS BUREAU (PRAB)
 पॉलिटिकल रिसर्च अॅण्ड अॅनालिसेस ब्युरो (प्राब)


Tuesday, 23 January 2018

2019 च्या लोकसभा- विधानसभा निवडणूका शिवसेना स्वतंत्र लढविणार- कार्यकारिणीत ठराव मंजूर

लोकसभा व विधानसभा निवडणूक शिवसेना स्वबळावर लढवणार


2019 मधील लोकसभा निवडणूक व महाराष्ट्र विधानसभा निवडणुकीमध्ये भारतीय जनता पक्षाबरोबर (भाजप) न करण्याची घोषणा शिवसेनेकडून आज (मंगळवार) करण्यात आली. सेनेचे खासदार संजय राउत यांनी मुंबईमध्ये शिवसेनेच्या अधिवेशनात यासंदर्भातील ठराव मांडला आणि तो एकमताने संमत करण्यात आला. याबरोबरच लोकभेच्या महाराष्ट्रातील 48 पैकी 25 जागा; आणि विधानसभेच्या 288 पैकी 150 जागा जिंकण्याचा निर्धारही शिवसेनेकडून व्यक्त करण्यात आला. उद्धव यांचे तरुण पुत्र व युवा सेनेचे नेते आदित्य यांनाही राजकीय बढती देत पक्षाच्या राष्ट्रीय कार्यकारिणीत स्थान देण्यात आल्याची घोषणा यावेळी करण्यात आली. सध्याचे राज्यातील मंत्री एकनाथ शिंदे आणि चंद्रकांत खैरे, अनंत गीते आणि आनंदराव अडसूळ या खासदारांना सेना नेते म्हणून मान्यता देण्यात आली. यावेळी  संमत करण्यात आलेल्या इतर ठरावांत महाराष्ट्रातील शेतकऱ्यांना पूर्ण कर्जमाफी करण्याची मागणी करण्यात आली.मागील वर्षी झालेली मुंबई महानगरपालिका निवडणुकही शिवसेनेने स्वबळावरच लढवली होती. यावेळी दोन्ही पक्षाच्या नेत्यांनी एकमेकांवर शेलक्या शब्दांत टीका केली होती. त्यानंतर दोन्ही पक्षांनी एकमेकांवर कुरघोडी करण्याची एकही संधी सोडलेली नाही. त्यामुळे लोकसभा आणि विधानसभा निवडणुकीत शिवसेना भाजपच्या विरोधात रान उठवणार असल्याचे स्पष्ट झाले आहे. २०१४ साली केंद्रात सत्तेत आल्यापासून शिवसेना आणि भाजपामध्ये अगदी सुरुवातीपासूनच कुरबुरी सुरु झाल्या होत्या. केंद्रात मंत्रीपद मिळण्यावरुन दोन्ही पक्षांतील वाद विकोपाला पोहोचला होता. त्यानंतर राज्यात मोठा भाऊ आणि लहान भाऊ कोण? यावरून दोन्ही पक्ष समोरासमोर उभे ठाकले होते. त्यामुळे विधानसभा निवडणुकीत पक्षप्रमुख उद्धव ठाकरे यांनी स्वबळावर लढण्याचा निर्णय घेतला. मात्र, या निवडणुकीत भाजपाने १२२ जागांवर विजय मिळवत शिवसेनेचा पराभव केला होता. त्यावेळी बहुमताचा आकडा गाठण्यासाठी राष्ट्रवादी काँग्रेसने भाजपाला पाठिंबा द्यायची तयारी दर्शवली होती. त्यामुळे शिवसेनेने नाईलाजाने फडणवीस सरकारला पाठिंबा देऊ केला होता. मात्र, नंतरच्या काळातही दोन्ही पक्षातील दरी सातत्याने वाढत गेली.मागील वर्षी झालेली मुंबई महानगरपालिका निवडणुकही शिवसेनेने स्वबळावरच लढवली होती. यावेळी दोन्ही पक्षाच्या नेत्यांनी एकमेकांवर शेलक्या शब्दांत टीका केली होती. त्यानंतर दोन्ही पक्षांनी एकमेकांवर कुरघोडी करण्याची एकही संधी सोडलेली नाही. त्यामुळे शिवसेना आगामी लोकसभा आणि विधानसभा निवडणूक स्वबळावर लढणार, हे जवळपास स्पष्ट होते. अखेर आज शिवसेनेच्या राष्ट्रीय कार्यकारिणीच्या बैठकीत आगामी लोकसभा आणि विधानसभा निवडणूक स्वबळावर लढवण्याचा ठराव मंजूर करण्यात आला. शेतकऱ्यांच्या पिकाला मातीमोल भाव मिळत आहे. भारत हा कृषीप्रधान देश आहे, हे वाक्य केवळ शालेय पाठ्यपुस्तकांपुरते मर्यादित राहिले आहे. शिवसेनेने मध्यंतरी राज्यात शेतकऱ्यांच्या कर्जमाफीसाठी मोठे आंदोलन उभारले. शिवसेनेच्या रेट्यामुळे सरकारनेही कर्जमाफीही केली. मात्र, कर्जमाफीच्या अंमलबजावणीतील गोंधळामुळे ही मदत शेतकऱ्यांपर्यंत पोहोचली नाही. त्यामुळे शेतकऱ्यांचा सातबारा कोरा करावा, या मागणीचा ठराव मांडत असल्याचे सुभाष देसाई यांनी सांगितले.


एकनाथ शिदे, आदित्य ठाकरेंची सेनेच्या नेतेपदी वर्णी, मनोहर जोशी, सुधीर जोशीही पदावर कायम


अपेक्षेप्रमाणे युवासेना प्रमुख आदित्य ठाकरे यांना शिवसेनेच्या नेतेपदी बढती मिळाली. शिवसेनेच्या संघटनात्मक निवडणुकीत यावर शिक्कामोर्तब करण्यात आला. शिवसेनेच्या कार्यकारिणीच्या बैठकीत ही घोषणा करण्यात आली. सेनेचे ज्येष्ठ नेते मनोहर जोशी आणि सुधीर जोशी यांचे नेतेपदही कायम ठेवण्यात आले आहे. त्याचबरोबर एकनाथ शिदे यांचीही नेतेपदी निवड करण्यात आली.राजकीय पक्षांना संघटनात्मक निवडणुकांची औपचारिकता पार पाडावी लागते. त्यानुसार पंचवार्षिक निवडणुकांची प्रक्रिया शिवसेनाप्रमुख बाळासाहेब ठाकरे यांच्या जयंतीनिमित्त वरळीच्या वल्लभभाई पटेल सभागृहात पार पडली. प्रभावशाली नेते आमदार अनिल परब यांच्याकडेही नेतेपदाची जबाबदारी सोपविली जाण्याची शक्यता होती. यावेळी केंद्रीय निवडणूक आयोगाचे मुख्य कार्यकारी अधिकारी अॅड. बाळकृष्ण जोशी यांनी निवडणुकीचे काम पाहिले.राज्यमंत्री गुलाबराव पाटील यांनी आदित्य ठाकरे यांच्या नावाची शिवसेना नेतेपदासाठी निवड झाल्याची घोषणा केली. त्यानंतर सभागृहात जल्लोष झाला. तसेच फटाके फोडण्यात आले. त्याचबरोबर एकनाथ शिंदे आनंदराव अडसूळ, अनंत गीते, चंद्रकांत खैरे यांचीही नेतेपदी निवड करण्यात आली. खासदार अरविंद सावंत, आमदार नीलम गोऱ्हे, अनिल परब, डॉ. अमोल कोल्हे, मनिषा कायंदे यांची पक्षाच्या प्रवक्तेपदी निवड करण्यात आली. मिलिंद नार्वेकर यांची सचिवपदी नियुक्ती करण्यात आली.

शिवसेनेचे एकूण १३ नेते असतील

मनोहर जोशी
सुधीर जोशी
लीलाधर ढाके
दिवाकर रावते
संजय राऊत
रामदास कदम
गजानन कीर्तीकर
सुभाष देसाई

नविन नियुक्ती

आदित्य ठाकरे
एकनाथ शिंदे
चंद्रकांत खैरे
आनंदराव अडसूळ
अनंत गीते

शिवसेना सचिव- मिलींद नार्वेकर, सूरज चव्हाण.

प्रवक्ते- अरविंद सावंत, निलम गोऱ्हे, मनिषा कायंदे, अमोल कोल्हे, अनिल परब

=================================
POLITICAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS BUREAU (PRAB)

पॉलिटिकल रिसर्च अॅण्ड अॅनालिसेस ब्युरो (प्राब)



शिवसेना राज्यात स्वबळावर निवडणूक लढविल्यास होणारा परिणाम - 

आगामी लोकसभा व विधानसभा निवडणुका स्वबळावर लढण्याचा निर्णय शिवसेनेने जाहीर केला आहे. या निर्णयामुळे शिवसेनेचे नुकसान होईल अशा प्रतिक्रिया भाजप पदाधिकारी देत असले तरी त्यांच्या अपेक्षेप्रमाणे नुकसान होईल असे नाही. कारण लोकसभा व विधानसभा निवडणूक एकत्रितपणे घेतल्यास वेगळे परिणाम असतील तसेच शिवसेनेने आगामी निवडणुकीपूर्वी राज्य सरकारमधून फारकत घेऊन वेगळेपण दर्शवून जनतेमध्ये विश्वासाहार्य वातावरण निर्माण केल्यास वेगळे परिणाम असतील. जर शिवसेना राज्य सरकारमधून बाहेर पडले नाहीत, कार्यकाल पूर्ण होईपर्यंत सरकारमध्ये राहून वेगळेपण निर्माण करण्याचा प्रयत्न केल्यास आगामी लोकसभा व विधानसभा निवडणुकीत निश्चितपणे नुकसान होईल यामध्ये कोणतीही शंका नाही. शिवसेना स्वबळावर लढल्यास लोकसभेच्या सध्या असलेल्या जागांपैकी ५ जागांवर नुकसान होईल. लोकसभा व विधानसभा निवडणुका एकत्रितपणे घेतल्यास आणि शिवसेना स्वबळावर लढल्यास सध्या असलेल्या जागांपैकी लोकसभेतील ९ जागांवर नुकसान होईल तर विधानसभेतील सध्या असलेल्या जागांपैकी १३ जागांवर नुकसान होईल. सेनेने राज्य सरकारमधून बाहेर पडून वेगळेपण दर्शवून जनतेमध्ये विश्वासाहार्य वातावरण निर्माण केल्यास विधानसभा निवडणुकीत चांगले यश मिळेल असे वाटते- चंद्रकांत भुजबळ 
- पॉलिटिकल रिसर्च अॅण्ड अॅनालिसेस ब्युरो (प्राब) 
POLITICAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS BUREAU (PRAB) 

Monday, 22 January 2018

लोकसभेसाठी शांतिगिरी महाराजांनी स्वत:च केली उमेदवारी जाहीर

शांतिगिरी महाराजांची लोकसभा उमेदवारीची घोषणा 


औरंगाबाद लोकसभेसाठी औरंगाबादच्या शांतिगिरी महाराजांनी स्वतःची उमेदवारी जाहीर केली असल्याने आगामी लोकसभा निवडणुकीत भाजप - सेना युती होणार नसल्याचे मानले जात आहे. पंतप्रधान नरेंद्र मोदींचे हात बळकट करण्यासाठी, निवडणूक भाजप कडून लढणार असल्याचे शांतिगिरी महाराज म्हणाले. काही दिवसांपूर्वी भाजपच्या अनेक दिग्गज नेत्यांनी शांतिगिरी महाराज यांची भेट घेतली होती. त्यामुळं शांतिगिरी भाजपचे लोकसभेचे उमेदवार असल्याची चर्चा सुरु झाली होती. त्यात आता शांतिगिरी महाराजांनी घोषणा केल्याने, ते निवडणूक लढवणार हे निश्चितच झाले आहे. औरंगाबाद लोकसभेसाठी औरंगाबादच्या शांतिगिरी महाराजांनी स्वतःची उमेदवारी जाहीर केली आहे. मात्र, यावर भाजपने भूमिका स्पष्ट केली नाही. शांतिगिरी महाराजांचे सध्याचे खासदार चंद्रकांत खैरे यांच्या समोर मोठं आव्हान असू शकत, 2009 च्या निवडणुकीत हि शांतिगिरी महाराज अपक्ष म्हणून लढले होते आणि लाखभर मत मिळवत खैरे ला चांगलेच झुंजवले होते, त्यात महाराजांनी आताच घोषणा करणे म्हणजे सेना खासदार चंद्रकांत खैरे ना सुद्धा आता पासूनच कामाला लागवे लागणार आहे. शांतिगिरी महाराज यांनी भाजपकडून लोकसभा निवडणूक लढवण्याची इच्छा व्यक्त केल्यामुळे भाजपमधील इतर इच्छुकांचे धाबे दणाणले आहे. विधानसभेचे अध्यक्ष हरिभाऊ बागडे, महिला आयोगाच्या अध्यक्षा विजया रहाटकर, डॉ.भागवत कराड, माजी मंत्री जयसिंगराव गायकवाड, शहर-जिल्हाध्यक्ष किशनचंद तनवाणी यांच्यासह भाजपचे बाराजण लोकसभा निवडणूक लढवण्यास तयार आहेत.
2009 मध्ये धार्मिक कार्य सोडून शांतीगिरींनी राजकारणाच्या आखाड्यात उडी घेतली होती. त्यावेळी राजकीय महत्त्वाकांक्षा वाढलेल्या शांतीगिरींना काँग्रेसने महाकुंभमेळ्याच्या आखाड्यातून थेट राजकीय आखाड्यात आणले होते. मात्र शांतीगिरी महाराज चंद्रकांत खैरें यांचा पराभव करू शकले नव्हते, परंतु खैरे-शांतीगिरी वाद मात्र वाढत गेला. मात्र पराभवानंतर पुन्हा राजकारण नाही, असे शांतीगिरी म्हणाले होते. त्यामुळे राजकीय शांतता होती, तरीही २०१४च्या मधल्या काळात त्यांना काँग्रेसचे महाराष्ट्र प्रभारी मोहन प्रकाश त्यांच्या संपर्कात होते. त्यामुळे ते काँग्रेससोबत जाणार अशी अटकळ बांधण्यात येत होती. २०१४ ची लोकसभेची निवडणूक जाहीर झाली अन् शांत वाटणार्‍या शांतीगिरींनी थेट मनसे अध्यक्ष राज ठाकरे यांची भेट घेतली होती . त्यामुळे ते मनसेच्या रेल्वे इंजिनात बसणार असे वाटले होते. मात्र तसे घडले नाही. राजकीय पाठिंबा जाहीर करताना त्यांनी कोणाचे नाव घेतले नाही, परंतु कल खैरे यांच्या बाजूने दिला होता. त्यानंतर काँग्रेसच्या गटाने त्यांच्या अनुयायांनी नितीन पाटील यांच्या बाजूने जाणार असल्याचे स्वत:च जाहीर करून टाकले होते त्यामुळे मतदारांत संभ्रम निर्माण झाला होता. हा संभ्रम स्वत: शांतीगिरी दूर करतील, असे अपेक्षित होते. परंतु त्यावेळी शांतीगिरी काही बोलण्यापूर्वीच खैरे त्यांच्या दरबारात दाखल झाले होते. त्यानंतर त्यांची राजकीय भूमिका गुलदस्त्यातच राहिली होती.  शांतीगिरीजी मौनगिरीजी महाराज यांनी २००९ ची लोकसभा निवडणूक डोली हे चिन्हावर अपक्ष म्हणून लढवली होती. २००९ मध्ये १९ जण २००९ च्या लोकसभा निवडणुकीत २२ पैकी १९ उमेदवारांचे डिपॉझिट जप्त झाले होते. तेव्हा एकूण ७ लाख १२ हजार मतदान झाले होते. डिपॉझिट वाचविण्यासाठी किमान ९० हजार मते मिळविणे आवश्यक होते. शिवसेनेचे चंद्रकांत खैरे, काँग्रेसचे उत्तमसिंह पवार आणि अपक्ष उमेदवार शांतीगिरीजी मौनगिरीजी महाराज वगळता इतरांना तेवढी मते मिळविता आली नव्हती. चंद्रकांत भाऊराव खैरे (शिवसेना - धनुष्य-बाण),  यांना २ लाख ५५ हजार, उत्तमसिंह पवार (काँग्रेस - पंजा) यांना २ लाख २२ हजार आणि शांतीगिरीजी महाराजांना १ लाख ४८ हजार मते मिळाली होती.

शांतीगिरीजी मौनगिरीजी महाराज यांची माहिती

नाव- शांतीगिरीजी मौनगिरीजी महाराज
मूळ नाव- (प्रसिद्ध नाही)
शिक्षण- १० वी (मार्च १९७६ उतीर्ण)
प्राथमिक शिक्षण- माधवराव बोरसे हायस्कूल जुनिअर आर्टस लाखलगाव जि. नाशिक
राजकीय- लोकसभेची निवडणूक -२००९ मध्ये अपक्ष उमेदवारी; तिसऱ्या क्रमांकाची १ लाख ४८ हजार मते प्राप्त.
धार्मिक कार्य- संत जनार्दन स्वामी यांना त्यांच्या धार्मिक कार्यांना समर्पित
श्री संत सदागुरु जनार्दन स्वामी मौंगीगिरी महाराजांच्या अध्यात्मिक मार्गदर्शनाखाली ते गुरुकुलहून वेरूळ आश्रमात शिक्षण
स्वामी शांतीगिरि महाराज संत सद्गुरु जनार्दन स्वामींच्या अपूर्ण कार्याची स्थापना करण्याचे काम करत आहेत
संत सद्गुरु जनार्दन स्वामी यांच्या आशीर्वादाने त्यांची जबाबदारी वाढविण्यात आली आहे
श्रीमहमंदळेश्वर स्वामी शांतीगिरि महाराज संत जनार्दन स्वामींचे वारस आहेत
औरंगाबाद आणि नाशिक येथील अनेक भाविकांच्या मनात त्यांच्याविषयी आदर आहे.
स्थावर मालमत्ता - स्थावर मालमत्ता नाशिक,औरंगाबाद जिल्ह्यात मोठ्याप्रमाणात आहेत.
अधिक माहिती- www.santjanardanswami.com







POLITICAL RESEARCH & ANALYSIS BUREAU (PRAB)

पॉलिटिकल रिसर्च अॅण्ड अॅनालिसेस ब्युरो (प्राब)


Sunday, 21 January 2018

न्यायालयीन शुल्कात वाढ


कायद्यातील बदलाने कोर्ट फीमध्ये भरमसाठ वाढ

 राज्य सरकारने 1998 सालच्या कायद्यात बदल केल्याने 16 जानेवारी 2018 पासून न्यायालयीन शुल्कात वाढ झाली आहे. पूर्वी तारीख बदलण्यासाठी 10 रूपयांचा स्टॅम्प द्यावा लागायचा, त्यासाठी आता 50 रूपये मोजावे लागणार आहेत.वकीलपत्रासाठी 10 रूपयांऐवजी 30 रूपये लागतील. कोर्टातून कोणत्याही कागदपत्राची प्रत मिळवण्यासाठी पूर्वी 4 रूपये द्यावे लागायचे, आता 20 रूपये लागतील.न्यायालयात कितीही किंमतीचा दावा असू द्या, त्याला जास्तीत जास्त 3 लाख रूपये कोर्ट फी होती, त्यात आता थेट दहा लाखांपर्यंत वाढ करण्यात आली आहे. कायद्यातील बदलाअगोदर 1 लाखाच्या दाव्यासाठी 6 हजार 430 रूपये कोर्ट फी होती, तर आता 7 हजार 330 रुपये मोजावे लागतील.या प्रमाणेच हायकोर्टाच्या अनेक शुल्कांमध्येही वाढ झाली आहे. वरील सर्व दर जिल्हा न्यायालयाचे आहेत. हायकोर्टातली दरवाढ वेगळी आणि अधिक आहे.हायकोर्टात कॅवेट दाखल करण्यासाठी पूर्वी 50 रूपये लागत होते, तर 250 रुपये लागतील. दरम्यान, यामध्ये 10 लाखांची मर्यादा ही सर्वात मोठी वाढ आहे. यामध्ये सात लाख रुपयांनी वाढ करण्यात आली आहे. त्यामुळे खटला दाखल करणे, न्यायालयीन स्थगिती मिळवणे, जामीनपत्र आदींसाठी सध्या असणाऱ्या शुल्कात वाढ होणार आहे. न्यायालयात कितीही किंमतीचा दावा असू द्या, त्याला जास्तीत जास्त 3 लाख रूपये कोर्ट फी होती, त्यात आता दहा लाखांपर्यंत वाढ करण्यात आली आहे. कायद्यातील बदलाअगोदर 1 लाखाच्या दाव्यासाठी 6 हजार 430 रूपये कोर्ट फी होती, तर आता 7 हजार 330 रुपये मोजावे लागतील.न्यायदान हा आपल्या संविधानानुसार प्रत्येक नागरिकाला मिळालेला मूलभूत अधिकार आहे. त्यामुळे न्यायदानाच्या प्रक्रियेतील शुल्क आकारणी ही नफेखोरीवर आधारित नसते. सर्वोच्च न्यायालयाने श्रीमाल्लू विरुद्ध स्टेट ऑफ मद्रास या खटल्यात हे स्पष्ट केले आहे की, न्यायालयीन शुल्क हे न्यायालयाच्या कामकाजाला येणाऱ्या खर्चापेक्षा अधिक असता कामा नये.न्यायालयीन कारभारात न्यायाधीशांचे वेतन, नव्या न्यायालयांची उभारणी, न्यायालयीन कर्मचाऱ्यांचे वेतन, पायाभूत सुविधा, गाड्या, वीज आदी अनेक बाबींवर खर्च होत असतो. न्यायालयीन शुल्कामध्ये २००२ मध्ये वाढ करण्याचा अध्यादेश जारी करण्यात आला होता. मात्र त्याच्या विरोधात न्यायालयात काही जणांनी याचिका दाखल केल्यावर गुलाम वहानवटी यांच्या अध्यक्षतेखाली उच्च न्यायालयाच्या निर्देशानुसार एक समिती तयार करण्यात आली होती. या समितीच्या अहवालाचा आधार घेत सरकारने हा निर्णय घेतला आहे.न्यायालयीन शुल्कामध्ये मूल्याधारित (अॅड वेलोरम) व स्थिर असे दोन प्रकार आहेत. सरकारने मूल्याधारित म्हणजे वस्तूच्या मूल्यानुसार आकारल्या जाणाऱ्या शुल्कामध्ये दोन ते अडीच टक्क्यांनी वाढ करण्याचा, तर स्थिर शुल्कामध्ये दहापट वाढ करण्यात आली आहे. मूल्याधारित शुल्कातील १७ बाबींचे, तर स्थिर शुल्कातील ४० बाबींचे शुल्क महागणार आहे. त्यामुळे यापुढे दावा अथवा अपील दाखल करण्यासाठी किंवा कौटुंबिक संपत्तीच्या वाटणीचे दावे, पती-पत्नीमधील वाटणीचे दावे, संपत्ती विवाद आदी बाबींसाठी अधिक शुल्क मोजावे लागेल. तसेच ३० दिवसांमध्ये रिव्ह्यू पिटिशन करण्यासाठी वा ३० दिवसांनंतर करण्यासाठीही अधिक पैसे द्यावे लागणार आहेत. पिटिशन करण्यासाठी वेगवेगळ्या स्तरांवरील न्यायालयीन शुल्क हे ४५ पैशांपासून ते ६५ पैशांपर्यंत होते. ते आता ५० रुपये केले असून १.२५ पैसे असणाऱ्या बेल बाँडला आता १२.५० रुपये मोजावे लागतील. घटस्फोटासाठी द्याव्या लागणाऱ्या लिखीत हमीपत्रासाठीही सव्वा रुपयांऐवजी १२.५० रुपये भरावे लागतील. वकालतानाम्यासाठीही आकारल्या जाणाऱ्या शुल्कात वाढ करण्यात आली आहे. न्यायालयीन शुल्काद्वारे २०० ते २५० कोटी रुपये जमा होत असून नवी न्यायालये व त्या अनुषंगाने होणाऱ्या खर्चात मात्र खूप वाढ झालेली आहे. तसेच सव्वा रुपया, ४५ पैसे हे आजच्या काळात चुकते करणेही अवघड असून आता ५ पैसे अथवा २५ पैशांचे चलन उपलब्ध नसताना हे आकारणेही अयोग्य आहे. तसेच वाढ टक्केवारीत मोठी वाटत असली प्रत्यक्ष किमतीत ही वाढ सर्वसामान्यांच्या खिशाला परवडणारी व कित्येक दिवसांपासून प्रलंबित राहिलेली असल्याने ती करणे योग्यच आहे. राज्याच्या महसुलात वाढ होण्यासाठी विविध उपाययोजना करत असून त्याचाच हा भाग आहे. त्यामुळेच गेली अनेक वर्षे प्रलंबित असलेल्या निर्णयावर विधिमंडळासमोर ठेवून ही सुधारणा केली असून आता अंमलबजावणी सुरु करण्यात आली आहे.MAHARASHTRA ACT No. X OF 2018.(First published, after having received the assent of the Governor in the “MaharashtraGovernment Gazette”, on the 16th January 2018.)An Act further to amend the Maharashtra Court-fees Act.WHEREAS it is expedient further to amend the Maharashtra CourtfeesAct, for the purposes hereinafter appearing; it is hereby enacted in theSixty-eighth Year of the Republic of India as follows :—1. (1) This Act may be called the Maharashtra Court-fees(Amendment) Act, 2017.(2) It shall come into force on such date as the State Governmentmay, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.Short titleandcommencement






The Maharashtra Court-Fees Act, 1959[4th March 2016]Maharashtra Act No. 36 of 1959 An Act to consolidate and amend the law relating to fees taken in the Court and public offices and fees taken in respect of certain matters in the State of Bombay, other than fees falling under entries 77 and 96 of List 1 in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India. Whereas it is expedient to consolidate and amend the law relating to fees taken in the Courts and public offices and fees taken in respect of certain matters in the State of Bombay, other than fees falling under entries 77 and 96 of List I in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India. It is hereby enacted in the Tenth year of the Republic of India, as follows:-

1. Short Title, Extent and Commencement-

(1)This Act may be called by the Maharashtra Court-fees Act, 1959.(2)It extends to the whole of the State of Maharashtra.(3)It shall come into force on such date as the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint.(4)The provisions of this Act shall not apply to fees or stamps relating to documents presented or to be presented before any Officer serving under the Central Government.(5)In the absence of any specific provision to the contrary nothing in this act shall affect any special law now in force relating to fees taken in the Courts and public offices.

2. Definitions-

In this Act unless the context otherwise requires-(a)" Chief Controlling Revenue authority" means such officer as the State Government may, by notification in the Official gazette, appoint in this behalf for the whole or any part of the (State of Maharashtra);(b)"Collector" includes any officer authorized by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority to perform the functions of a Collector under this Act;(c)"Plaint" includes a written statement pleading a set-off or counter-claim.

3. Levy of Fees in High Court on its original side-

The fees payable for the time being to the clerks and officers (other than the Sheriffs and attorney) of the High Court; or chargeable in that Court under No. 10 of the first and Nos.11, 14, 17, 20 and 21 of the second schedule to this act annexed; and the fees for the time being chargeable in the Court of small causes at Bombay and its office, shall be collected in manner hereinafter appearing.

4. Procedure in case of difference as to necessity or amount of fee

(1)When any difference arises between the Officer whose duty it is to see that any fee is paid under this Chapter and any suitor or attorney, as to the necessity of paying a fee or the amount thereof, the question shall, when the difference arises in the High Court, be referred to the taxing officer, whose decision thereon shall be final, subject to revision, on an application, made within thirty days from the date of the decision, by the suitor or attorney or such officer as may be appointed in this behalf by the State Government, by the Chief Justice or by such Judge of the High Court as the Chief Justice shall appoint either generally or specially in this behalf. The Chief Justice shall declare who shall be taxing-officer within the meaning of this sub-section.(2)When any such difference arises in the Court of Small Causes of Bombay, the question shall be referred to the Clerk of the Court, whose decision thereon shall be final, subject to revision, on an application, made within 1thirty days from the date of the decision, by the party concerned or such officer as may be appointed in this behalf by the State Government, by the Chief Judge of the Small Cause Court or by such Judge of that Court as the Chief Judge shall appoint either generally or specially in this behalf.

Chapter III Computation of Fees

5. Fees on documents filed etc., in courts or in public offices

(1)No document of any of the kinds specified as chargeable in the first or second Schedule to this Act annexed shall be filed, exhibited or recorded, in any Court of Justice, or shall be received or furnished by any public officer, unless in respect of such document there has been paid a fee of an amount not less than that indicated by either of the said Schedules as the proper fee for such document.(2)When any difference arises between the officer whose duty it is to see that any fee is paid under this Act and any suitor or his pleader, as to the necessity of paying a fee or the amount thereof, the question shall, when the question arises in the High Court, be referred to the taxing officer whose decision thereon shall be final, subject to revision, on an application, made within thirty days from the date of the decision, by the suitor or his pleader or such officer as may be appointed in this behalf by the State Government, by the Chief Justice or by such Judge of the High Court as the Chief Justice shall appoint either generally or specially in this behalf.(3)When any such difference arises in the City Civil Court, Bombay, the question shall be referred to the Registrar of the City Civil Court whose decision shall be final, subject to revision, on an application, made within thirty days from the date of the decision, by the party concerned or such officer as may be appointed in this behalf by the State Government, by the Principal Judge or such other Judge of the said Court as the Principal Judge shall appoint either generally or specially in this behalf.(4)When such difference arises in any other Court, the question shall be referred to the final decision of the Judge presiding over such Court.

6. Computation of Fees payable in certain suits

The amount of fee payable under this Act in the suits next hereinafter mentioned shall be computed as follows:-(i)In suits for money (including suits for damages or compensation, or arrears of maintenance, of annuities, or of other sums payable periodically)—according to the amount claimed;(ii)In suits for maintenance (with or without a prayer for the creation of a charge) and for annuities or other sums payable periodically according to the value of the subject matter of the suit, and such value shall be deemed to be, in the case of a suit for maintenance, the amount claimed to be payable for one year and in any other case, ten times such amount:Provided that if in a suit for maintenance the plaintiff obtains a decree for maintenance the defendant shall be liable to make good the deficit, if any, between the fee payable on ten times the amount awarded for one year and the fee already paid by the plaintiff ; and the amount of such deficit shall, without prejudice to any other mode of recovery, be recoverable as an arrear of land revenue;(iii)In suits for moveable property other than money, where the subject matter has a market-value according to such value at the date of presenting the plaint;(iv)(a)In suits for declaration to obtain adjudication against recovery of money from the plaintiff, whether the recovery is as land revenue or arrears of land revenue or tax or duty or cess or fee or fine or penalty or under any decree or order of a court or any certificate or award other than under the Arbitration Act, 1940, or in any other manner-one fourth of ad valorem fee leviable on the amount sought to be recovered according to the scale prescribed under Article 1 of Schedule I with minimum fee of sixty rupees:Provided that, when in addition any consequential relief other than possession is sought, the amount of fee shall be one half of ad valorem fee on the amount sought to be recovered:Provided further that, when the consequential reliefs also sought include a relief for possession the amount of fee shall be the full ad valorem fee on the amount sought to be recovered;(b)In suits for declaration similar to those falling under subparagraph (a) in respect of moveable property one fourth of ad valorem fee leviable on the value of the moveable property subject to the minimum fee as under sub-paragraph (a):Provided that when in addition any consequential relief other than possession is sought, the amount of fee shall be one-half of ad valorem fee leviable on the value of such property:Provided further that when the consequential reliefs also sought include a relief for possession the amount of fee shall be the full ad valorem fee leviable on such value ;(c)In suits for declaration of the status of plaintiff, to which remuneration, honorarium, grant, salary, income, allowance or return is attached, one-fourth of ad valorem fee leviable on the emoluments or value of return for one year:Provided that, when in addition any consequential relief other than possession is sought the amount of fee shall be one-half of ad valorem fee on such emoluments or value of return: Provided further that when the consequential reliefs also sought include a relief for possession the amount of fee shall be the full ad valorem on such emoluments or value of return;(d)In suits for declaration in respect of ownership, or nature of tenancy, title, tenure, right, lease, freedom or exemption from, or non-liability to, attachment with or without sale or other attributes, of immoveable property, such as a declaration that certain land is personal property of the Ruler of any former Indian State or public trust property or property of any class or community one fourth of ad valorem fee leviable for a suit for possession on the basis of title of the subject-matter, subject to a minimum fee of one hundred rupees: Provided that if the question is of attachment with or without sale the amount of fee shall be the ad valorem fee according to the value of the property sought to be protected from attachment with or without sale or the fee of sixty rupees, whichever is less:Provided further that, where the defendant is or claims under or through a limited owner, the amount of fee shall be one-third of such ad valorem fee, subject to the minimum fee specified above:Provided also that, in any of the cases falling under this clause except its first proviso, when in addition any consequential relief other than possession is sought the amount of fee shall be one-half of ad valorem fee and when the consequential reliefs also sought include a relief for possession the amount of fee shall be the full ad valorem fee;(e)In suits for declaration of easement or right to benefits arising out of immoveable property, with or without an injunction or other consequential relief, the amount of fee shall be as shown in the Table below:-Table
AreaFee
(a) The area within the limits of the Municipal Corporation of Brihan Mumbai or the Corporation of the City of the Nagpur or any Municipal Corporation constituted under the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.one-fourth of the ad valorem fee leviable for a suit for possession of the servient tenement or the dominant tenement, whichever is less, subject to a minimum fee of one hundred rupees.
(b) Areas within the limits of Municipal Councils constituted under the Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965.one-sixth of the ad valorem fee leviable for a suit for possession of the servient tenement or the dominant tenement, whichever is less, subject to a minimum fee of one hundred rupees.
(c) Any other area in the State of Maharashtra.one hundred rupees.
(f)In suits for declaration of status to which no direct monetary attribute is attached such as a declaration that the plaintiff is a married husband or wife of the defendant or divorced husband or wife of the defendant or a declaration about legitimacy of children or about citizenship rights or about an adoption one hundred rupees:Provided that where injunction or other consequential relief is also sought in such case, the amount of fee shall be one hundred fifty rupees;(g)In suits for declaration of a charge in favour of the plaintiff on moveable or immoveable property one-half of ad valorem fee payable on the charge amount:Provided that where injunction or other consequential relief is also sought in such cases, the amount of fee shall be the full ad valorem fee payable on the charge amount.(h)In suits for declaration in respect of periodical charge or money return in favour of or against the plaintiff one half of ad valorem fee payable on the charge for 5 years if the charge is annual and on the charge for one year if the period of the charge is less than one year;(ha)In suits for declaration that any sale, or contract for sale or termination of contract for sale, of any moveable or immoveable property is void one-half of ad valorem fee leviable on the value of the property;(hb)In suits for declaration that any proceedings for compulsory acquisition of any moveable or immoveable property are void one half of ad valorem fee leviable on the value of the property;(i)In suits for accounts according to the amount at which the relief sought is valued in the plaint or memorandum of appeal, subject to the provisions of section 8, and subject to a minimum fee of one hundred rupees;(j)In suits where declaration is sought, with or without injunction or other consequential relief and the subject-matter in dispute is not susceptible of monetary evaluation and which are not otherwise provided for by this Act ad valorem fee payable, as if the amount or value of the subject matter was one thousand rupees;In all suits under clauses (a) to (i), the plaintiff shall state the amount at which he values the relief sought, with the reasons for the valuation;(v)In suits for the possession of land, houses and gardens according to the value of the subject-matter; and such value shall be deemed to be, where the subject-matter is a house or garden according to the market value of the house or garden and where the subject-matter is land, and(a)where the land is held on settlement for a period not exceeding thirty years and pays the full assessment to Government a sum equal to forty times the survey assessment;(b)where the land is held on a permanent settlement, or on a settlement for any period exceeding thirty years, and pays the full assessment to Government a sum equal to eighty times the survey assessment; and(c)where the whole or any part of the annual survey assessment is remitted a sum computed under sub-paragraph (a) or subparagraph (b), as the case may be, in addition to eighty times the assessment or, the portion of assessment so remitted;(vi)In suits to enforce a right of pre-emption—according to the value (computed in accordance with paragraph (v) of this section) of the land, house or garden in respect of which the right is claimed;(vii)In suit for partition and separate possession of a share of joint family property or of joint property, or to enforce a right to a share in any property on the ground that it is joint family property or joint property whether or not the plaintiff is in actual or constructive possession of the property of which he claims to be a co-parcener or co-owner according to the value of the share in respect of which the suit is instituted;Explanation— For the purposes of this paragraph, if the property in which a share is claimed consists of or includes any land assessed to land revenue for the purpose of agriculture, the value of such land shall be deemed to be the value as determined under paragraph (v) of this section;(viii)In suits for the interest of an assignee of land revenue, fifty- times his net profits as such for the year next before the date of presenting the plaint;(ix)In suits to set aside an attachment of land or of an interest in land or revenue—according to the amount for which the land or interest was attached.Provided that, where such amount exceeds the value of the land or interest the amount of fee shall be computed as if the suit were for the possession of such land or interest;(x)In suits against a mortgagee for the recovery of the property mortgaged, and in suits by a mortgagee to foreclose the mortgage, or, when the mortgage is made by conditional sale, to have the sale declared absolute according to the principal money expressed to be secured by the instrument of mortgage;(xi)In suits for specific performance-(a)Of a contract of sale according to the amount of the consideration,(b)Of a contract of mortgage according to the amount agreed to be secured,(c)Of a contract of lease according to the aggregate amount of the fine or premium (if any) and of the rent agreed to be paid during the first year of the term,(d)Of an award according to the amount or value of the property in dispute;(xii)In the following suits between landlord and tenant:-(a)for the delivery by a tenant of the counterpart of a lease,(b)to enhance the rent of a tenant having a right of occupancy,(c)for the delivery by a landlord of a lease,(d)for the recovery of immoveable property from a tenant, including a tenant holding over after the determination of a tenancy,(e)to contest a notice of ejectment,(f)to recover the occupancy of immoveable property from which a tenant has been illegally ejected by the landlord, and(g)for abatement of rent- according to the amount of the rent of the immoveable property to which the suit refers, payable for the year next before the date of presenting the plaint.

7. Fee on memorandum of appeal against order or award relating to compensation in certain cases-

(1)The amount of fee payable under this Act on a memorandum of appeal against an order relating to compensation under any Act for the time being in force for the acquisition of land for public purposes shall be computed according to the difference between the amount awarded and the amount claimed or challenged by the Appellant:Provided that, where the State Government is an acquiring body, it shall not be liable for payment of fee in such appeals.Explanation- For the purposes of this sub-section, "amount" means the amount in dispute and it shall not include the amount of statutory benefits(2)The amount of fee payable under this Act on a memorandum of appeal against an award of a Claims Tribunal preferred under section 110-D VI of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, shall be computed as follows:-(i)If such appeal is preferred by the insurer or owner of the motor vehicle- the full ad-valorem fee leviable on the amount at which the relief is valued in the memorandum of appeal according to the scale prescribed under Article 1 of Schedule I;(ii)If such appeal is preferred by any other person one half of ad-valorem fee leviable on the amount at which the relief is valued in the memorandum of appeal according to the said scale.Provided that if such person succeeds in the appeal, he shall be liable to make good the deficit, if any, between the full ad-valorem fee payable on the relief awarded in the appeal according to the said scale and the fee already paid by him; and the amount of such deficit shall, without prejudice to any other mode of recovery, be recoverable as an arrear of land revenue.

8. Inquiry as to valuation of Suits-

If the Court is of opinion that the subject-matter of any suit has been wrongly valued or if an application is made to the Court for the revision of any valuation made, the Court may revise the valuation and determine the correct valuation and may hold such inquiry as it thinks fit for such purpose.

9. Investigation to ascertain proper valuation-

(1)For the purpose of an inquiry under section 8 the Court may depute, or issue a commission to, any suitable person to make such local or other investigation as may be necessary and to report thereon to the Court. Such report and any evidence recorded by such person shall be evidence in the enquiry.(2)The Court may, from time to time, direct such party to the suit as it thinks fit to deposit such sum as the Court thinks reasonable as the costs of the inquiry, and if the costs are not deposited within such time as the Court shall fix, may, notwithstanding anything contained in any other Act, reject the plaint or as the case may be the appeal, if such party is the plaintiff or the appellant and, in any other case, may recover the costs as a public demand.Provided that, when any plaint or appeal is rejected under this section the court-fee already paid shall not be liable to be refunded.

10. Power of Persons making inquiry under Section 8 and 9-

(1)The Court, when making an inquiry under section 8 and any person making an investigation under section 9 shall have respectively for the purposes of such inquiry or investigation, the powers vested in a Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, in respect of the following matters, namely :(a)enforcing the attendance of any person and examining him on oath or affirmation ;(b)compelling the production of documents or material objects ;(c)issuing commissions for the examination of witnesses ;(d)taking or receiving evidence on affidavits.(2)An inquiry or investigation referred to in sub-section (1) shall be deemed to be a judicial proceeding within the meaning of sections 193 and 228 of the Indian Penal Code.

11. Cost of inquiry as to valuation and refund of excess fees-

If in the result of an inquiry under section 8 the Court finds that the subject-matter of the suit has been undervalued, the Court may order the party responsible for the undervaluation to pay all or any part of the costs of the inquiry.If in the result of such inquiry the Court finds that the subject-matter of the suit has not been undervalued the Court may, in its discretion, order that all or any part of such costs shall be paid by Government or by any party to the suit at whose instance the inquiry has been undertaken, and if any amount exceeding the proper amount of fee has been paid shall refund the excess amount so paid.

12. Appointment of inspecting officers and recovery in cases reported by them-

(1)The State Government may appoint generally, or in any case, or for any specified class of cases, in any local area, one or more officers to be called inspecting officers.(2)The inspecting officer may, subject to the control of the Court concerned, examine the records of any case which is pending or has been disposed of, with a view to finding out whether proper fees have been paid therein.(3)If on such examination, the inspecting officer finds that the fee payable under this Act on any document filed, exhibited or recorded in such case has not been paid or has been insufficiently paid, he shall report the fact to the presiding officer of the Court.(4)Such presiding officer, after satisfying himself of the correctness of such report, shall record a provisional finding that the proper fee has not been paid and determine the amount of the fee payable and such further sum as he thinks reasonable as the costs of the inquiry and the person from whom the fee or the difference thereof, if any, and the costs shall be recoverable.(5)After recording a finding under sub-section (4), the presiding officer shall issue a notice to the person referred to in that sub-section to show cause why he should not be ordered to pay the fee and the costs determined hereunder, and, if sufficient cause is not shown, the presiding officer shall confirm the finding and make an order requiring such person to pay the proper fee and the costs before a specified date.(6)If such person fails to pay the fee and the costs in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (5), they shall, on the certificate of such presiding officer, be recoverable as an arrear of land revenue.

13. Taxing of Court-Fees and their recovery in suits for mesne profits or account

(1)In a suit for the recovery of possession of immovable property and mesne profits or for mesne profits or for an account, the difference, if any, between the fee actually paid and the fee which would have been payable had the suit comprised the whole of the profits or amount found due shall, on delivery of judgment, be taxed by the Court and shall be leviable from the plaintiff and if not paid by him within thirty days from the date of the judgment be recoverable according to the law and under the rules for the time being in force for the recovery of arrears of land revenue.(2)The Court shall send a copy of the decree passed in such suit to the Collector.(3)No decree for mesne profits passed in any such suit by the Court shall be executed, until a certificate to the effect that such difference is paid or recovered, signed by the Court which passed the decree or by the Collector who recovered the amount, is produced along with the application for such execution.Explanation- For the purpose of this section, "plaintiff includes any party to a suit to whom any profits or amount are or is found to be due.

14. Decision of questions as to valuation-

(1)Every question relating to valuation for the purpose of determining the amount of any fee chargeable under this Chapter on a plaint or memorandum of appeal shall be decided by the Court in which such plaint or memorandum as the case may be, is filed, and such decision shall be final as between the parties to the suit.(2)But whenever any such suit comes before a Court of appeal, reference or revision, if such Court considers that the said question has been wrongly decided to the detriment of the revenue, it shall require the party by whom such fee has been paid to pay so much additional fee as would have been payable had the question been rightly decided.

15. Refund of Fees paid on memorandum of appeal-

If an appeal or plaint, which has been rejected by the lower Court on any of the grounds mentioned in the Code of Civil Procedure 1908, is ordered to be received, or if a suit is remanded in appeal, on any of the grounds mentioned in rule 23 of Order XLI in the first Schedule to the same Code for a second decision by the lower Court, the Appellate court shall grant to the appellant a certificate, authorising him to receive back from the Collector or by way of e-payment, in the manner as prescribed by rules the full amount of fee paid on the memorandum of appeal:Provided that if, in the case of remand in appeal, the order of remand shall not cover the whole of the subject-matter of the suit, the certificate so granted shall not authorise the appellant to receive back more than so much fee as would have been originally payable on the part or parts of such subject-matter in respect whereof the suit has been remanded.

16. Refund of fee on application for review of judgement-

Where an application for review of judgment is presented on or after the thirtieth day from the date of the decree, the Court, unless the delay was caused by the applicant’s laches, may, in its discretion, grant him a certificate authorizing him to receive back from the Collector or by way of e-payment, in the manner as prescribed by rules] so much of the fee paid on the application as exceeds the fee which would have been payable had it been presented before such day.

17. Refund where court reverses or modifies its former decision on ground of mistake-

Where an application for a review of judgment is admitted, and where, on the rehearing, the Court reverses or modifies its former decision on the ground of mistake in law or fact, the applicant shall be entitled to a certificate from the Court authorizing him to receive back from the Collector or by way of e-payment, in the manner as prescribed by rules so much of the fee paid on the application as exceeds the fee payable on any other application to such court under the second schedule to this Act No. 1, clause (c) or clause (f).But nothing in the former part of this section shall entitle the applicant to such certificate where the reversal or modification is due, wholly or in part, to fresh evidence which might have been produced at the original hearing.

17A. Period of Limitation for refund of fees under Section 15.16 or 17-

Where certificate is granted to any person under sections 15, 16 or 17, no fee thereunder shall be refunded, unless such person presents it to the Collector or such other authority as may be prescribed by rules, for encashment, within two years from the date of issue of the certificate by the Court.

18. Multifarious Suits-

Where a suit embraces two or more distinct subjects, the plaint or memorandum of appeal shall be chargeable with the aggregate amount of the fees to which the plaints or memoranda of appeal in suit embracing separately each of such subjects would be liable under this Act.Nothing in the former part of this section shall be deemed to affect the power conferred by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Schedule I, Order II, rule 6.

19. Written Examination of Complaints-

When the first or only examination of a person who complaints of the offence of wrongful confinement, or wrongful restraint, or of any offence other than an offence for which police officers may arrest without a warrant, and who has not already presented a petition on which a fee has been levied under this Act, is reduced to writing under the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the complainant shall pay a fee of ten rupees unless the Court thinks fit to remit such payment.

20. Exemption of Certain Documents-

Nothing contained in this Act shall render the following documents chargeable with any fee:(i)Power-of-attorney to institute or defend a suit when executed by a member of any of the Armed Forces of the Union not in civil employment.(iii)Application for certified copies of documents or for any other purpose in the course of a criminal proceeding presented by or on behalf of the State Government to a criminal court;(iii)Written statements called for by the Court after the first hearing of a suit.(iv)Probate of a will, letters of administration, and, save as regards debts and securities, a certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 or any corresponding law in force, where the amount or value of the property in respect of which the probate or letters or certificate shall be granted does not exceed one thousand rupees.(v)Application or petition to a Collector or other officer making a settlement of land-revenue, or to a Board of Revenue, or a Commissioner of Revenue, relating to matters connected with the assessment of land or the ascertainment of rights thereto or interest therein, if presented, previous to the final confirmation of such settlement.(vi)Application relating to a supply for irrigation of water belonging to Government.(vii)Application for leave to extend cultivation, or to relinquish land, when presented to an officer of land-revenue by a person holding, under direct engagement with Government, land of which the revenue is settled, but not permanently.(viii)Application for service of notice of relinquishment of land or of enhancement of rent.(ix)Written authority to an agent to distrain.(x)Petition, application, charge or information respecting any offence when presented, made or laid to or before a Police Officer, or to or before the Heads of Villages or the Village Police.(xi)Petition by a prisoner, or other person in duress or under restraint of any Court or its Officer. (xii) Complaint of a public servant (as defined in the Indian Penal Code), a Municipal officer, or an officer or servant of a Railway Company.(xiii)Application for the payment of money due by Government to the applicant.(xiv)Petition of appeal against any municipal tax.(xv)Applications for compensation under any law for the time being in force relating to the acquisition of property for public purposes, other than those chargeable under Article 15 of Schedule I.(2)Nothing contained in this Act shall render an application to the Court under section 543 of the Companies Act, 1956, chargeable with any fee.Provided that, if the applicant succeeds, the person, director, managing agent, secretary and treasurer, manager, liquidator or officer of the company concerned against whom an order is made by the Court under that section, shall be liable to pay the fee leviable on a plaint in a suit for the same relief as is ordered by the Court; and the amount of such fee shall, without prejudice to any other mode of recovery, be recoverable as an arrear of land revenue.

Chapter IV Probates, letters of administration and certificates of administration.

21. Relief where too high a Court Fee has been paid-

Where any person on applying for the probate of a will or letters of administration has estimated the property of the deceased to be of greater value than the same has afterwards proved to be, and has consequently paid too high a court-fee thereon, if within six months after the true value of the property has been ascertained, such person produces the probate or letters to the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority for the local area in which the probate or letters has or have been granted, and delivers to such Authority a particular inventory and valuation of the property of the deceased, verified by affidavit or affirmation, and if such Authority is satisfied that a greater fee was paid on the probate or letters than the law required, the said Authority may-(a)cancel the stamp on the probate or letters if such stamp has not been already cancelled;(b)substitute another stamp for denoting the court-fee which should have been paid thereon; and(c)make an allowance for the difference between them as in the case of spoiled stamps, or repay the same in money, at his discretion.

22. Relief when debts due from a deceased person have been paid out of his estate-

Whenever it is proved to the satisfaction of such Authority that an executor or administrator has paid debts due from the deceased to such an amount as, being deducted out of the amount or value of the estate, reduces the same to a sum which, if it had been the whole gross amount or value of the estate, would have occasioned a less court-fee to be paid on the probate or letters of administration granted in respect of such estate than has been actually paid thereon under this Act, such Authority may return the difference, provided the same be claimed within three years after the date of such probate or letters.But when, by reason of any legal proceeding, the debts due from the deceased have not been ascertained and paid, or his effects have not been recovered and made available, and in consequence thereof the executor or administrator is prevented from claiming the return of such difference within the said term of three years, the said authority may allow such further time for making the claim as may appear to be reasonable under the circumstances.

23. Relief in case of several grants-

Whenever a grant of probate or letters of administration has been or is made in respect of the whole of the property belonging to an estate, and the full fee chargeable under this Act has been or is paid thereon, no fee shall be chargeable under the same Act when a like grant is made in respect of the whole or any part of the same property belonging to the same estate.Whenever such a grant has been or is made in respect of any property forming part of an estate, the amount of fees then actually paid under this Act shall be deducted when a like grant is made in respect of property belonging to the same estate, identical with or including the property to which the former grant relates.

24. Probates declared valid as to trust property though not covered by Court Fee-

The probate of the will or the letters of administration of the effects of any person deceased here to before or hereafter granted shall be deemed valid and available by his executors or administrators for recovering, transferring or assigning any moveable or immoveable property whereof or whereto the deceased was possessed or entitled, either wholly or partially as a trustee, notwithstanding the amount or value of such property is not included in the amount or value of the estate in respect of which a court-fee was paid on such probate or letters of administration.

25. Provision for case when too low a court fee has been paid on probates etc.-

Where any person on applying for probate or letters of administration has estimated the estate of the deceased to be of less value than the same has afterwards proved to be, and has in consequence paid too low a court-fee thereon, the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority for the local area in which the probate or letters has or have been granted may, on the value of the estate of the deceased being verified by affidavit or affirmation, cause the probate or letters of administration to be duly stamped on payment of the full court-fee which ought to have been originally paid thereon in respect of such value and of the further penalty, if the probate or letters is or are produced within one year from the date of the grant, of five time, or, if it or they is or are produced after one year from such date, of twenty times, such proper court-fee, without any deduction of the court-fee originally paid on such probate or letters:Provided that if the application be made within six months after the ascertainment of the true value of the estate and the discovery that too low a court-fee was at first paid on the probate or letters, and if the said Authority is satisfied that such fee was paid in consequence of a mistake or of its not being known at the time that some particular part of the estate belonged to the deceased, and without any intention of fraud or to delay the payment of the proper court-fee, the said Authority may remit the said penalty, and cause the probate or letters to be duly stamped on payment only of the sum wanting to make up the fee which should have been at first paid thereon.

26. Administrator to give proper security before letters stamped under Section 25-

In case of letters of administration on which too low a court fee has been paid at first, the said Authority shall not cause the same to be fully stamped in manner aforesaid until the administrator has given such security to the Court by which the letters of administration have been granted as ought by law to have been given on the granting thereof in case the full value of the estate of the deceased had been then ascertained.

27. Executors, etc. not paying full court-fee on probates, etc. within six months after discovery of under payment-

Where too low a court-fee has been paid on any probate or letters of administration in consequence of any mistake, or of its not being known at the time that some particular part of the estate belonged to the deceased, if any executor or administrator acting under such probate or letters does not, within six months after the discovery of the mistake or of any effects not known at the time to have belonged to the deceased, apply to the said Authority and pay what is wanting to make up the court-fee which ought to have been paid at first on such probate or letters, he shall forfeit the sum of one thousand rupees and also a further sum at the rate of ten rupees per cent. on the amount of the sum wanting to make up the proper court-fee.

28. Notice of applications for probate or letters of administration to be given to Revenue Authorities and procedure thereon-

(1)Where an application for probate or letters of administration is made in any Court other than the High Court, the Court shall cause notice of the application to be given to the Collector.(2)Where such an application as aforesaid is made to the High Court, the High Court shall cause notice of the application to be given to the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority.(3)The Collector within the local limits of whose revenue jurisdiction the property of the deceased or any part thereof is, may at any time inspect or cause to be inspected, and take or cause to be taken copies of, the record of any case in which application for probate or letters of administration has been made; and if, on such inspection or otherwise, he is of opinion that the petitioner has under-estimated the value of the property of the deceased, the Collector shall forward his report, giving therein his reasons for his opinion and his estimate of the true valuation, to the Prothonotary of the High Court or the Court, as the case may be, serving at the same time a copy of his report on the petitioner.(4)If within thirty days from the date of receipt of the copy of the Collector’s report served on him under sub-section (3), the petitioner does not file in court his objections to the Collector’s valuation, the Court shall make an order amending the petitioner’s valuation, in accordance with the report of the Collector.(5)If within the aforesaid period the petitioner files in court his objection, the Court shall hold, or cause to be held, an inquiry in accordance with the provisions of sections 9, 10 and 11 as if the application were a suit, and shall record a finding as to the true value, as near as may be, at which the property of the deceased should have been estimated. The Collector shall be deemed to be a party to the inquiry.(6)The finding of the Court recorded under sub-section (5) shall be final, but shall not bar the entertainment and disposal by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority of any application under section 25.(7)The State Government may make rules for the guidance of Collectors in the exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (3).

29. Payment of court-fee in respect of probate and letters of administration-

(1)No order entitling the petitioner to the grant of probate or letters of administration shall be made upon an application for such grant until the petitioner has filed in the Court a valuation of the property in the form set forth in the third Schedule, and the Court is satisfied that the fee mentioned in No. 10 of the first Schedule has been paid on such valuation.(2)The grant of probate or letters of administration shall not be delayed by reason of any report made by the Collector under section 28, sub-section (3).

30. Recovery of Penalties etc.-

(1)Any excess fee found to be payable on an inquiry held under section 28 and any penalty or forfeiture under section 27, may, on the certificate of the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, be recovered from the executor or administrator as if it were an arrear of land-revenue by any Collector.(2)The Chief Controlling Revenue Authority may remit the whole or any part of any such penalty or forfeiture as aforesaid or any part of any penalty under section 25 or of any court-fee under section 25 in excess of the full court-fee which ought to have been paid.

31. Sections 5 and 40 not to apply to probates or letters of administration-

Nothing in section 5 or section 40 shall apply to probates or letters of administration.

Chapter V Process Fees

32. Rules as to costs of processes-

The High Court shall make rules as to the following matters:-(i)the fees chargeable for serving and executing processes issued by such Court in its appellate jurisdiction, and by the other Civil and Revenue Court established within the local limits of such jurisdiction;(ii)the fees chargeable for serving and executing processes issued by the Criminal Courts, established within such limits in the case of offences other than offences for which police officers may arrest without a warrant; and(iii)the remuneration of the peons and all other persons employed by leave of a Court in the service or execution of processes.The High Court may from time to time alter and add to the rules so made.All such rules, alterations and additions shall, after being confirmed by the State Government, be published in the Official Gazette, and shall thereupon have the force of law.

33. Tables of process fees-

A table in the English and regional languages, showing the fees chargeable for such service and execution, shall be exposed to view in a conspicuous part of each Court.

34. Number of peons in District and subordinate Courts-

Subject to rules to be made by the High Court and approved by the State Government, every District Judge, the Principal Judge of the Bombay City Civil Court and every Magistrate of a District shall fix, and may from time to time alter the number of peons necessary to be employed for the service and execution of processes issued out of his Court, and each of the Courts subordinate thereto, and for the purposes of this section, every Court of Small Causes established under the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, shall be deemed to be sub-ordinate to the Court of the District Judge.

35. Number of Peons in Revenue Court-

Subject to rules to be framed by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority and approved by the State Government, every officer performing the functions of a Collector of a District shall fix, and may from time to time alter, the number of peons necessary to be employed for the service and execution of processes issued out of his Court or the Courts subordinate to him.

Chapter VI Of the Mode of Levying Fees

36. Rate of fee in force on date of presentation of document to be applicable-

All fees shall be charged and collected under this Act at the rate in force on the date on which the document chargeable to court fee is or was presented.

37. Collection of fees by stamps or e-payment-

All fees referred to in section 3 or chargeable under this Act shall be collected by stamps or e-payment.

38. Stamps to be impressed or adhesive-

The stamps used to denote any fees chargeable under this Act shall be impressed or adhesive or partly impressed or partly adhesive, as the State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette from time to time, direct.

39. Rules for supply, number, renewal and keeping accounts of stamps-

The State Government may, from time to time, make rules for regulating-(a)the supply of stamps to be used under this Act,(b)the number of stamps to be used for denoting any fee chargeable under this Act,(c)the renewal of damaged or spoiled stamps,(d)the keeping accounts of all stamps used under this Act ;(e)the manner of payment of court-fee and refund thereof by e-payment.Provided that in the case of stamps used under section 3 in the High Court, such rules shall be made, with the concurrence of the Chief Justice of such Court. All such rules shall be published in the Official Gazette, and shall thereupon have the force of law.

40. Stamping documents inadvertently received-

No document which ought to bear a stamp under this Act shall be of any validity, unless and until it is properly stamped. But, if any such document is through mistake or inadvertence received, filed or used in any Court or office without being properly stamped, the presiding Judge or the head of the office, as the case may be, or, in the case of the High Court, any Judge of such Court, may, if he thinks fit, order that such document be stamped as he may direct; and, on such document being stamped accordingly, the same and every proceeding relative thereto shall be as valid as if it had been properly stamped in the first instance.

41. Amended Document-

Where any such document is amended in order merely to correct a mistake and to make it conform to the original intention of the parties, it shall not be necessary to impose a fresh stamp.

42. Cancellation of Stamps-

No document requiring a stamp under this Act shall be filed or acted upon in any proceeding in any Court or office until the stamp has been cancelled.Such officer as the Court or the head of office may from time to time appoint shall, on receiving any such document, forthwith effect such cancellation by punching out the figure-head so as to leave the amount designated on the stamp untouched, and the part removed by punching shall be burnt or otherwise destroyed:Provided that, where court-fee is paid by e-payment, the officer competent to cancel stamp shall verify the genuineness of the payment and after satisfying himself that the court-fee is paid, shall lock the entry in the computer and make an endorsement under his signature on the document that the court-fee is paid and the entry is locked.

Chapter VII Miscellaneous

43. Repayment of fee in certain circumstances-

(1)When any suit in a Court or any proceeding instituted by presenting a petition to a Court under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is settled by agreement of parties before any evidence is recorded, or any appeal or cross objection is settled by agreement of parties before it is called on for effective hearing by the Court, half the amount of the fee paid by the plaintiff, petitioner, appellant, or respondent on the plaint, petition, appeal or cross objection, as the case may be, shall be repaid to him by the Court:Provided that, no such fee shall be repaid if the amount of fee paid does not exceed twenty-five rupees or the claim for repayment is not made within one year from the date on which the suit, proceeding, appeal or cross objecton was settled by agreement.(2)The State Government may, from time to time, by order, provide for repayment to the plaintiffs, petitioners, complaints under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, appellants or respondents of any part of the fee paid by them on plaints, petitions, complaints under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, appeals orcross objections, in suits complaints under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, proceedings or appeals disposed of under such circumstances and subject to such conditions as may be specified in the order.Explanation.— For the purpose of this section, effective hearing shall exclude the dates when the appeal is merely adjourned without being heard or argued.

44. Admission in criminal cases of documents for which proper fee has not been paid-

Whenever the filing or exhibition in a Criminal Court of a document in respect of which the proper fee has not been paid is, in the opinion of the presiding Judge, necessary to prevent a failure of justice, nothing contained in section 5 shall be deemed to prohibit such filing or exhibition.

45. Sale of stamps-

(1)The State Government may, from time to time make rules for regulating the sale of stamps to be used under this Act, the persons by whom alone such sale is to be conducted, and the duties and remuneration of such persons.(2)All such rules shall be published in the Official Gazette and shall thereupon have the force of law.(3)Any person appointed to sell stamps who disobeys any rule made under this section, and any person not so appointed who sells or offers for sale any stamp, shall, on conviction, be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or with fine which may extend to two thousand rupees, but which shall not be less than five hundred rupees, or with both.

46. Power to reduce or remit fees-

The State Government may, from time to time, by notification in the Official Gazette, reduce or remit, in the whole or in any part of the territories under its administration all or any of the fees mentioned in the first and second schedules to this Act annexed, and may in like manner cancel or vary such order.

47. Saving of fees to certain offices of High Court-

Nothing in Chapters II and VI of this Act applies to the fees which any officer of the High Court is allowed to receive in addition to a fixed salary.

48. Saving as to stamp duties-

Nothing in this Act shall be deemed to affect the stamp duties chargeable under any other law for the time being in force relating to stamp duties.

49. Repeal and Saving-

(1)On the commencement of this Act, the laws specified in column 3 of Schedule IV hereto annexed shall be repealed in the manner and to the extent specified in column 4 thereof:Provided that, such repeal shall not affect the previous operation of any of the laws so repealed and anything done or any action taken (including any appointment, notification, order, rule, form, application, reference, notice, report or certificate made or issued) under any such law shall, in so far as it is not inconsistent with the provisions of this Act, be deemed to have been done or taken under the corresponding provision of this Act and shall continue to be in force accordingly, unless and until superseded by anything done or any action taken under this Act:Provided further that, all the fees shall be charged and collected under this Act at the rate in force on the date on which the document chargeable to court-fee is or was presented.(2)(a)All stamps in denominations of annas four or multiples thereof shall be deemed to be stamps of the value of twenty-five naya paise or, as the case may be, multiples thereof and valid accordingly.(b)If any person is possessed of a stamp or stamps in any denominations other than denominations of annas four or multiples thereof, and such stamps or stamps has or have not been spoiled, the Collector shall repay to such person the value of such stamp or stamps in money calculated in accordance with the provisions of sub-section (2) of section 14 of the Indian Coinage Act, 1906, upon such person delivering up, within six months from the commencement of this Act, such stamp or stamps to the Collector.

50. Amendment of Suits Valuation Act-

On the commencement of this Act, the laws specified in column 3 of Schedule V thereto annexed shall be amended in the manner and to the extent specified in column 4 thereof.

51. Reduction of court-fee from amount of stamps duty payable on final order of partition-

Notwithstanding anything contained in the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958, where court-fee is paid in a suit for partition in accordance with the provisions of clause (vii) of section 6 of this Act the stamp duty payable on a final order for effecting a partition passed by any Revenue Authority or any Civil Court under article 46 in Schedule 1 to the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 shall be reduced by the amount of the Court-fee paid in such suit.

52. Rules made by Government to be laid before State Legislature-

All rules made by the State Government under this Act shall be laid before each House of the State Legislature as soon as may be after they are made and shall be subject to such modifications as the State Legislature may make during the session in which they are so laid or the session immediately following:-

Schedule I

Ad Valorem Fees
Number (1)……. (2)Proper Fee (3)
1. Plaint or memorandum of appeal (not otherwise provided for in this Act) or, of cross objection presented to any Civil or Revenue Court.When the amount or value of the subject matter in dispute does not exceed one thousand rupees.Two hundred rupees.
When such amount or value exceeds one thousand rupees, for every one hundred rupees, or part thereof, in excess of one thousand rupees, upto five thousand rupees.Twelve rupees.
When such amount or value exceeds five thousand rupees, for every hundred rupees, or part thereof, in exeess of five thousand rupees, upto ten thousand rupees.Fifteen rupees.
When such amount or value exceeds ten thousand rupees, for every five hundred rupees, or part thereof, in excess of ten thousand rupees, upto twenty thousand rupees.Seventy-five rupees.
When such amount or value exceeds twenty thousand rupees, for every one thousand rupees, or part thereof, in excess of twenty thousand rupees, upto thirty thousand rupees.One hundred rupees.
When such amount or value exceeds thirty thousand rupees, for every two thousand rupees, or part thereof, in excess of thirty thousand rupees, upto fifty thousand rupees.One hundred rupees.
When such amount or value exceeds fifty thousand rupees, for every five thousand rupees, or part thereof, in excess of fifty thousand rupees, upto one lakh of rupees.One hundred and fifty rupees.
When such amount or value exceeds one lakh of rupees, for every ten thousand rupees, or part thereof, in excess of one lakh of rupees, upto eleven lakh of rupees.Two hundred rupees.
When such amount or value exceeds eleven lakh of rupees, for every one lakh of rupees, or part thereof, in excess of eleven lakh of rupees:One thousand and two hundred rupees.
Provided that, the maximum fee leviable on the plaint or memorandum of appeal or of cross objection shall be three lakh of rupees.
2. Plaint in a suit for possession under section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.…….A fee of one-half the amount prescribed in the scale under Article 1
3. Plaint, application or petition (including memorandum of appeal), to set aside or modify any award…….A fee on the amount or value of the award sought to be set aside or modified, according to the scale prescribed under Article 1.
3A. Application or petition (including Memorandum of Appeal) to set aside or modify arbitral award under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.……..A fee of one-half of the ad valorem fee on the amount or value of the award sought to be set aside or modified, according to the scale prescribed under Article-1.
4. Plaint, application or petition (including memorandum of appeal) which is capable of being treated as a suit, to set aside a decree or order having the force of a decree.…….The same fee as is leviable on a plaint in a suit to obtain the relief granted in the decree or order, as the case may be.
5. Plaint in a suit, application or petition (including memorandum of appeal), to set aside alienation to which the plaintiff, applicant or appellant, as the case may be, was a party, either directly or through a legal guardian other than de facto or ad hoc guardian, manager or partner or court.……A fee on the extent of the value of alienation to be set aside, according to the scale prescribed under Article 1.
6. Plaint in a suit (including memorandum of appeal) for possession between the guardian and ward, trustee and beneficiary, principal and agent, wife and husband, executor or administrator and beneficiary, receiver and owner of property and between persons having fiduciary relationship.……..A fee of one-half of the amount prescribed in the scale under Article 1.
7. Any other plaint, application or petition (including memorandum of appeal), to obtain substantive relief capable of being valued in terms of monetary gain or prevention of monetary loss, including cases wherein application or petition is either treated as a plant or is described as the mode of obtaining the relief as aforesaid…..A fee on the amount of the m o n e t a r y gain, or loss to be prevented, according to the scale prescribed under Article 1.
8. Application for review of judgment if presented on or after the 1thirtieth day, from the date of the decree.……The fee leviable on the plaint or memorandum of appeal.
9. Application for review of judgment if presented before the 1 thirtieth day from the date of the decree.……One-half of the fee leviable on the plaint or memorandum of appeal.
10. Probate of a will or letters of administration with or without will annexed.When the amount or value of the property in respect of which the grant of probate or letters is made exceeds one thousand rupees, on the amount or value upto fifty thousand rupees.Two per cent.
When the amount or value of the property in respect of which the grant of probate or letters is made exceeds fifty thousand rupees, on the part of the amount or value in excess of fifty thousand rupees upto two lakh rupees.Four per cent.
When the amount or value of the property in respect of which the grant of probate or letters is made exceeds two lakh rupees, on the part of the amount or value in excess of two lakh rupees upto three lakh of rupees.Six per cent.
When the amount or value of the property in respect of which the grant of probate or letters is made exceeds three lakh rupees, on the part of the amount or value in excess of three lakh of rupees:Seven and half per cent., subject to the maximum of 75,000 rupees.
Provided that when, after the grant of a certificate under Part X of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, or under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 or any corresponding law for the time being in force, in respect of any property included in an estate, a grant of probate or letters of administration is made in respect of the same estate, the fee payable in respect of the later grant shall be reduced by the amount of the fee paid in respect of the former grant.
11.Certificate under part X of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.The fee leviable in the case of a probate Article 10} on the amount or value of any debt or security specified in the certificate under section 374 of the Act , and two times this fee on XXXIX of 1950 , Reg.VIII of 1827. the amount or value of any debt or security to which the certificate is extended under section 376 of the Act. Note: - (1) The amount of a debt is its amount including interest on the day on which the inclusion of the debt in the certificate is applied for so far as such amount can be ascertained; (2) Whether or not any power with respect to a security specified in a certificate has been conferred under the Act ; and where such a power has been so conferred, whether the power is for the receiving of interest or dividend on, or for the negotiation or transfer of the security, or for the both purposes the value of the security is it is market value on the day on which the inclusion of the security in the certificate is applied for so far as such value can be ascertained .
12. Certificate under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 or under any corresponding Law in force.The fee leviable in the case of a probate (Art. 10) on the amount or the value of the property in respect of which the certificate is granted.
13. Plaint presented with an originating summons under the Rules of the High Court of Bombay, (Original Side)The fee leviable on a plaint any suit or the same relief subject to a minimum fee of one hundred rupees
15. Application to the Collector for a reference to the Court under section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, in its Application to the Bombay area or Vidarbha region of the State of Maharashtra or section 14 of the Land Acquisition Act, in its application to the Hyderabad area of that State, as the case may be.One half of the ad valorem fee on the difference if any, between the amount awarded by the Collector and the amount claimed by the applicant according to the scheme prescribed under Article 1 of Schedule 1, subject to a minimum fee of fifty rupees.
16. Application or petition made by any assessee to the High Court 5under subsection(2)of section 256 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.One-half of ad valorem fee leviable on the amount in dispute namely, the difference between the amount of tax actually assessed and the amount of tax admitted by the assesse as payable by him) subject to the minimum fee of one hundred twenty five rupees
16 A. An appeal filed after the 1st June 1999 and pending before the High Court against the order passed in appeal by the Appellate Tribunal under section 260 -A (2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.Ad valorem fee leviable on the amount in dispute that is the difference between the amount of tax . actually assessed and the amount of tax admitted by the assesse as payable by him subject to maximum fee of Rs. 10,000/-
16 B. An appeal filed after the 1st June 1999 and pending before the High Court against the order passed in appeal by the Appellate Tribunal under section 27 -A of Wealth Tax Act, 1957.One half of the Ad valorem fee leviable on the amount of dispute that is the difference between the amount of tax . actually assessed and the amount of tax admitted by the assessee as payable by him subject to maximum of Rs. 5,000/-
17. Application or petition made by any persons other than the Collector or the Commissioner to the High Court under any provision of the Sales Tax law for the time being in force in any part of the State of MaharashtraOne half of the Ad valorem fee leviable on the amount in dispute namely, the difference between the amount of tax actually assessed and the amount of tax admitted by the assesse as payable by him) subject to minimum fee of one hundred fifty
18. Application or petition containing complaint or charge of an offence under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.(A) When the amount of cheque does not exceed ten thousand rupees.Two hundred rupees.
(B) When the amount of cheque exceeds ten thousand rupees.Two hundred rupees for every ten thousand rupees or part thereof subject to the maximum of rupees one lakh fifty thousand.
Table of Rates of ad valorem fees leviable on the institution of suits.
When the amount or subject matter exceedBut Does not exceedProper Fee
1000200
10001100212
11001200224
12001300236
13001400248
14001500260
15001600272
16001700284
17001800296
18001900308
19002000320
20002100332
21002200344
22002300356
23002400368
24002500380
25002600392
26002700404
27002800416
28002900428
29003000440
30003100452
31003200464
32003300476
33003400488
34003500500
35003600512
36003700524
37003800536
38003900548
39004000560
40004100572
41004200584
42004300596
43004400608
44004500620
45004600632
46004700644
47004800656
48004900668
49005000680
50005100695
51005200710
52005300725
53005400740
54005500755
55005600770
56005700785
57005800800
58005900815
59006000830
60006100845
61006200860
62006300875
63006400890
64006500905
65006600920
66006700935
67006800950
68006900965
69007000980
70007100995
710072001010
720073001025
730074001040
740075001055
750076001070
760077001085
770078001100
780079001115
790080001130
800081001145
810082001160
820083001175
830084001190
840085001205
850086001220
860087001235
870088001250
880089001265
890090001280
900091001295
910092001310
920093001325
930094001340
940095001355
950096001370
960097001385
970098001400
980099001415
9900100001430
10000105001505
10500110001580
11000115001655
11500120001730
12000125001805
12500130001880
13000135001955
13500140002030
14000145002105
14500150002180
15000155002255
15500160002330
16000165002405
16500170002480
17000175002555
17500180002630
18000185002705
18500190002780
19000195002855
19500200002930
20000210003030
21000220003130
22000230003230
23000240003330
24000250003430
25000260003530
26000270003630
27000280003730
28000290003830
29000300003930
30000320004030
32000340004130
34000360004230
36000380004330
38000400004430
40000420004530
42000440004630
44000460004730
46000480004830
48000500004930
50000550005080
55000600005230
60000650005380
65000700005530
70000750005680
75000800005830
80000850005980
85000900006130
90000950006280
950001,00,0006430
1,00,0006430
2,00,0008430
3,00,00010, 430
4,00,00012, 430
5,00,00014, 430
6,00,00016, 430
7,00,00018, 430
8,00,00020430
9,00,00022430
10,00,00024430
11,00,00026430
12,00,00027630
13,00,00028830
14,00,00030030
15,00,00031230

Schedule II

Fixed Fees
Number-2Proper Fee
1. Application or petition(a) when presented to any officer of the Excise Department or to any Magistrate by any person having dealings with the Government, and when the subject matter of such application of relates exclusive to those dealings;five rupee.
or when presented to any officer of land-revenue by any person holding temporarily settled land under direct engagement with Government and when the subject matter of the application or a petition relates exclusively to such engagement;Five rupees.
or when presented to any Municipal Commissioner under any Act for the time being in force for the conservancy or improvement of any place, if the application or petition relates solely to such conservancy or improvement: or when presented to any Civil Court other than a principle Civil Court of original jurisdiction; or to any Court of Small Causes constituted under the provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887, or to a Collector or other officer of revenue or to a public officer in relation to any suit or case in which is the amount of value of the subject matter is less than fifty rupees;Five rupees.
Or when presented to any Civil, Criminal, or Revenue Court, or to any Board or executive officer for the purpose of obtaining a copy or translation of any judgement, decree or order passed by such Court, Board or Officer, or of any other document on record in such Court or office.Five rupees.
(c)(i) When containing a complaint or charge of any offence other than the offence under the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881.Five rupees.
(d) When presented to any competent Authority for the purpose of obtaining a certificate of DomicileTen rupees
(e) when presented to a Chief Controlling Revenue or Executive Authority or to a Commissioner of Revenue or to any Chief Officer Charged with executive administration of a division and not otherwise provided for by this Act.Ten rupees
(f) When presented to the High Court-
(i) For directions, orders or writs under Act Article 226 of the Constitution for any purpose other than the enforcement of the fundamental rights conferred by Part III thereof;One hundred twenty-five rupees
(ii) for directions orders or writs, under article 226 for the enforcement of any of the fundamental rights conferred by part III of the Constitution or for the exercise of its jurisdiction under Article 227 thereof;Two hundred and fifty rupees
(iii) In any other case not otherwise provided for by this Act .Twenty rupees
2. Revision application when presented to the High Court under section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause courts Act, 1887 or section 115 of the Code of civil Procedure, 1908Fifty Rupees
3. Application to any civil Court that records may be called for from another court.When the Court grants the application and is of opinion that the transmission of such records involves the use of the post.Five rupees in addition to any fee levied on the application under clause (a). Clause (c) or clause (f ) of Article 1 of this Schedule
4. First Application (other than a petition containing a criminal charge or information) for the summons of a witness or other person to attend either to give evidence or to produce a document, or in respect of the production or filing of an exhibit not being an affidavit made for the immediate purpose of being produced in Court.five rupees
5. Application for leave to sue as a pauper.Five rupees
6. Application for leave to appeal as a pauper.(a) When presented to a District Court.five rupees
(b) when presented to a Commissioner or the High Court.
Twenty rupees
7. Plaint or memorandum of appeal in a suit to obtain possession under the Mamlatdars Court Act, 1906.twenty-five rupees
8. Plaint or memoradum of appeal in a suit to establish or disprove a rith of occupancyTen rupees
9.Bail bond or other instrument of obligation given in pursuance of an order made by a court or Magistrate under any section of the *code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, other than section 109 or 110 thereof or under the Code of civil Procedure,1908 and not otherwise provided for by this ActTen Rupees
10. Bail-bonds in criminal cases, recognizance to prosecute and recognizances for personal appearance or otherwiseFive Rupees
11. Undertaking under section 49 of the Indian Divorce Act, 1869.Ten Rupees
12. Mukhtarnama or Vakalatnama .when presented for the conduct of any one case-
(a) to any Civil or Criminal Court other than the High Court, or to any Revenue Court or to any collector or Magistrate, or other executive officer;Ten Rupees
(b) to the High CourtFifteen Rupees
13. Memorundam of appeal when the appeal is not from a decree or an order having the force of a decree, and is presented(a) to any Civil Court other than the High Court, or to any Revenue Court or Executive officer other than the High Court or Chief Controlling Revenue or Executive Authority;Five Rupees
(b) to the Chief Controlling Executive or Revenue Authority;Ten rupees
(c) to the High Court.twenty-five rupees
14. Caveat(i) When presented to the High CourtFifty rupees
(ii) When presented to the Court other than High Court.twenty-five rupees
15. Application for permission to cut timeber in Government forests, or otherwise relating to such forests.Five rupees
16. Memorandum of appeal presented to –
(a) the State GovernmentTwenty rupees
(b) any Forest Officer, where such appeal is provided for by or under the Indian Forest Act, 1927, or any corresponding law in force.Four rupees
17. Petition in a suit under the Native Converts Marriage Dissolution Act, 1866.one hundred rupees
18. Application - (a) under section 20 of the Arbitration Act, 1940;Fifty rupees
(b) for probate or letters of administration or for revocation thereof under the Indian Succession Act, 1925.When the amount or value of the estate does not exceed two thousand rupees.Ten rupees
(c) for a certificate under part X of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, or Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 or any corresponding law for the time being in force;When it exceeds two thousand rupees, but does not exceed five thousand rupees.Thirty rupees
When it exceeds five thousand rupees.Fifty rupees
(d) for opinion or advice or for discharge from a Trust, or for appointment of new Trustees under section 34, 72,73 or 74 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882;Twenty Five Rupees.
(e) under rule 58 of Order XXI of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 regarding a claim to attached property.When the amount or value of the property exceeds five thousand rupeesThirty Rupees
19. agreement in writing stating a question for the opinion of the Court under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908Seventy Five Rupees
20. Every petition under the Indian Divorce Act, 1869 except petitions under section 44 of that Act and every memorandum of appeal under section 55 of that Act.one hundred rupees
21. Plaint ,application, petition, or memorandum of appeal under the parsi marriage and divorce Ac t, 1936 the Special marriage Act, 1954 or the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955;one hundred rupees
Provided that, where in addition to diverse damages are claimed.A fee as above plus a fee on the amount of damages claimed according to the scale prescribed under article 1 of Schedule 1.
22. Petitions under the Indian Christian Marriage Act, 1872, section 45 and 48.Ten Rupees
23. plain, petition or application (including memorandum of appeal) which is capable of being treated as a suit-
(a) for annulment of marriage;One hundred rupees
(b) for dissolution of marriage;One hundred rupees
(c) in suit for custody of minor;Seventy-five rupees
(d) for restitution of conjugal rights;One hundred rupees
(e) for judicial separation;One hundred rupees
(f) in or two any Civil Court not otherwise provided for and the subject, matter of which is not capable of being estimated in money value.Ad valorem fee payable, as if the amount or value of the subject matter was three hundred rupees
24. Copy or translation of a judgment or order not being, or having the force of a decree.When such judgment or order is given or made by any civil Court other than the High Court, or by any Revenue Court;Five Rupees
When such judgment or order is given or made by the High Court.Ten Rupees
25. Copy of a decree or order having the force of a decreeWhen such decree or order is made by any Civil Court other than the District Court or High court, or by any Revenue Court;Ten Rupees
When such decree or order is made by the District CourtTwenty rupees
When such decree or order is made by the High CourtTwenty-five rupees
26. Copy of any document (including power of attorney) liable to stamp-duty under the Bombay Stamp Act, 1958 or the Indian Stamp Act, 1899 or any corresponding law in force, as the case may be, when left by any party to a suit or proceeding in place of the original withdrawn.(a) When the stamp duty chargeable on the original does not exceed twenty rupeesTwo Rupees
(b) In any other case.Twenty Rupees
27. Copy of any revenue or judicial proceeding or order not otherwise provided for by this Act, or copy of any amount, statement, report or the like, taken out of any civil or Criminal or Revenue Court or office, or from the office of any chief Officer charged with the executive administration or of a divisionFor every three hundred and sixty words or fraction of three hundred and sixty words.Five Rupees
28. application made under the Bombay Money-lenders Act, 1946 or under any corresponding law in forceTen Rupees
29. Application presented to any registration Officer for search of registration records.Five Rupees
30. Appeal or application to the registrar under section 72 or, 73 as the case may be, of the 1Registration Act, 1908Five Rupees
31. (a) application for a licence under subclause (i) of clause (w):Five Rupees
(b) Application for certificate of registration under clause (xa) of sub-section (l) of section 33 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951.
32. Application or appeal to the Regional or State Transport Authority or the State Government under chapter IV of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988Twenty Rupees
33. Election petition questioning the election of a person in respect of the office- (a) of Sarpanch or Upasarpanch or member of a panchayat;Fifty rupees
(b) of councillor or member Muincipal Council, Zilla parishad, Panchayat Samiti or such other Local Authority;One Hundred Fifty Rupees
(c) of Mayor or Councillor of the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay or Mayor or Deputy Mayor or Councillor of the Corporation of the City of Nagpur or a Municipal corporation established under the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act,1949, or President, Vice-President, Chairman or Deputy Chairman of any local authority referred to in clause (b).Five Hundred Rupees
34. Application or petition to the Court under sections 391, 439 or 522 of the Comapanies Act,1956.Two Hundred Rupees
Any other application or petition to the Court for Judicial action or relief under the said Act, not otherwise provided for under this Act.Forty Rupees
35. Application-
(a) for order of arrest or attachment before judgment or for temporary injunction;Ten Rupees
(b) for compensation for arrest or attachment before judgment or in respect of temporary injunction obtained on insufficient grounds;Ten Rupees
(c) for the appointment of a receiver in a case in which the applicant has no present right of possession of the property in dispute;Twenty rupees
(d) for setting aside decree passed ex-parte or for review of order dismissing suit for defaultFive rupees
36. Appeal or application to the Cooperative Tribunal.Twenty five rupees
37. Application made by a party to the Magistrate under section 145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.Ten Rupees
38. Memorandum of appeal or application for revision or review presented under Chapter XIII of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 to-
(a) Appellate AuthorityFifty Rupees
(b) State GovernmentFifty Rupees
38A. Application,reference, complaint, appeal or, as the case may be, revision application filed under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.-
(a) Application to the Labour Court under section 25.-
(i) by the employer for declaration that the strike is illegal.Two hundred and fifty rupees
(ii) by a recognised union that the lockout is illegal.Hundred Rupees
(b) complaint under section 28 to the Labour Court with reference to item 1 of Schedule IV to the Act.
(i) by any union.Fifty rupees
(ii) by any employeeTwenty rupees
(c) Complaint to the Industrial Court under section 28 regarding any item in Schedule II or III to the Act.
(i) when by any union.Fifty rupees
(ii) by any employeeTwenty rupees
(d) appeal under section 42 and revision under section 44 to the Industrial Court.Fifty rupees
(e) application filed under section 50.Twenty rupees
(f) other miscellaneous matters not provided in the act of any of the above entries .Twenty rupees
38B. Application or reference under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947,—
(a) under section 2 (k)Two hundred and fifty rupees.
(b) to the Labour Court under section 2-A in any dispute or difference between workman and his employer connected with or arising out of discharge, dismissal, retrenchment or termination of the workmanFifty rupees.
(c) regarding any strikes and lock-outs to the Labour Court under section 24.One hundred rupees
(d) during the conciliation proceedings under section 33.Fifty rupees
(e) in any other miscellaneous cases other than referred above.Twenty rupees
38C . Application or reference under the Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946
(a) in arbitration proceeding to the Industrial Court under section 69,71 and 73-A.Two hundred and fifty rupees.
(b) to the Labour Court under section 78 read with section 79.Fifty rupees
(c) appeals filed to the Industrial Court under section 84 or revision application under section 85.Fifty rupees
(d) in any other miscellaneous cases other than those specified above.Twenty rupees
38-D. Claim or reference under section 6-A of the Bombay labour welfare Fund Act, 1953Twenty Rupees
38–E.. Application or reference under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1971.Twenty Rupees
38–F. Application for reference under the Maharashtra Mathadi, Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulations Employment and Welfare), Act 1969.Twenty Rupees
39. Save as otherwise provided in this Act or any other law memorandum of appeal or application for revision or review presented to the State Government under any Provincial or State Act or under any other rules or orders issued thereunder .Fifty Rupees
40. All adjournment applications in Civil and Criminal Courts.Ten Rupees

Schedule III

(See Section 29)Form of valuation (to be used with such modifications, if any, as may be necessary).IN THE COURT OFRe-Probate of the Will of (or administration of) the property and credits of the deceased.I……………………………………, solemnly affirm/ make oath and say that I am the executor (or one of the executors or one of the next of kin) of……………………………………….. deceased, and that I have truly set forth in Annexure A to this affidavit all the property and credit of which the above named deceased died possessed or was entitled to at the time of his death, and which have come, or are likely to come, to my hands.(2)I further say that I have also truly set forth in Annexure B all the items I am by law allowed to deduct.(3)I further say that the said assets, exclusive only of such last mentioned items but inclusive of all rents , interest, dividends and increased values since the date of the death of the said deceased, are under the value of.Annexure AValuation of the Moveable and Immoveable Property of the Deceased
Rs.
Cash in the house and at the banks, household goods, wearing apparel, books, plate, jewels etc. (State estimated value according to best of Executor's Administrator's belief).
Property in Government securities transferable at the Public Debt Office. (State description and value at the price of the day; also the interest separately, calculating it to the time of making the application)
Immovable property consisting of (State description, giving in the case of houses the assessed value, if any, and the number of years' assessment the market-value is estimated at, and in the case of land, the area, the market-value and all rents that have accrued. )
Leasehold property (if the deceased held any leases for years determinable, state the number of years' purchase the profit rents are estimated to the worth and the value of such, inserting separately arrears due at the date of death and all rents received or due since that date to the time of making the application)
Property in public companies (State the particulars and the value calculated at the price of the day, also the interest separately, calculating it to the time of making the application) .
Policy of insurance upon life, money out on mortgage and other securities, such as bonds, mortgages, bills, notes and other securities for money. (State the amount of the whole; also the interest separately, calculating it to the time of making the application)
Book-debts (other than bad)
Stock in trade (State the estimated value, if any)
Other property not comprised under the foregoing heads ... (State the estimated value, if any.)
Total……..
Deduct amount shown in annexure b not subject to duty
Net Total…………
Annexure B
Rs.
Amount of debts due and owing from the deceased, payable by law out of the estate. State the particulars of the debts with interest in respect of each debt separately calculating it to the time of making the application).
Amount of funeral expenses
Amount of mortgage encumbrances. (State the particulars of amount of mortgage encumbrance with interest in respect of each mortgage encumbrance separately, calculating it to the time of making the application).
Property held in trust not beneficially or with general power to confer a beneficial interest.
Other property not subject to duty.
Total

Schedule IV

(See Section 49)Laws Repealed
YearNumberLawExtent of Repeal
1870VIIThe Court-fees Act, 1870, in its application to the pre-reorganisation State of Bombay, excluding the transferred territories and to the Vidarbha region and the Kutch area of the State of Bombay.The whole, in so far as it relates to entries 3 and 66 of List II and entry 47 of List III in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India.
1870VIIThe Court-fees Act,1870 ,as modified and applied to the Saurashtra area of the State of Bombay by the State of Saurashtra (application of Central and Bombay Acts) Ordinance, 1948The whole, in so far as it relates to entries 3 and 66 of List II and entry 47 of List III in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India.
1324 FasliVIThe Hyderabad Court Fees Act, in its application to the Hyderabad area of the State of Bombay.The whole, in so far as it relates to entries 3 and 66 of List II and entry 47 of List III in the Seventh Schedule to the Constitution of India.
1932IIThe Bombay Finance Act, 1932Section 2 A and Part III Containing Sections 12,13 and 14.


Schedule V

(See Section 50)Laws Amended
YearNumberLawExtent of Amendment
1887VIIThe Suits Valuation Act, 1887 in its application to the pre-reorganisation state of Bombay, excluding the transferred territories and to the Vidarbha Region and the Kutch area of the State of Bombay.In section 9, the words and figures" of the Court-fees Act, 1870, and "shall be deleted.
1887VIIThe Suits Valuation Act, 1887, as modified and applied to the Saurashtra area of the State of Bombay by the State of Saurashtra (Application of Central and Bombay Acts) Ordinance, 1948.In section 9, the words and figures" of the Court-fees Act, 1870, and "shall be deleted.




Maharashtra issues notification for refund of court fees on withdrawal of cheque-bouncing case

If a complainant withdraws the case under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, before the charges are framed, he could get a refund of up to 50% of the court fees paid
If you plan to withdraw a cheque-bounce case in court before charges are framed, you may also receive about 50% of the court fees as refund. This move would not only benefit individuals, but also financial institutions who file such cases, then opt for out-of-court settlement. 
The Maharashtra government announced in a gazette notification in May that a claim for refund of court fees can be made after the withdrawal of the complaints for the cases, which are filed under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. 
In India, the Negotiable Instruments Act regulates commercial transactions which take place through cheques, promissory notes and bills of exchange. 
According to the Maharashtra government resolution (GR), the state government, in exercise of its powers conferred by section 43(2) of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959 will provide part of the court fees paid by the complainant under article 18 of schedule I, appended to the Act. Such refund will be paid to the complainant under two broad circumstances and conditions. 
First, under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, a refund of 50% of the total court fees will be made when the complainant withdraws a complaint, or when the offence was compounded, before framing of particulars/charges, provided the claim is made within one year from the date of withdrawal of the complaint. 
Similarly, 25% of the court fee will be refunded provided the complaint is withdrawn, or the offence is compounded, after farming of particulars/charges, or any subsequent stages of the complaint. Here again, a claim has to be made within a year.

===============================================